In 2025-26, Northern Region Educational Services Commission proposed a $44.5 million General Fund operating budget.
These are proposed NJDOE User-Friendly Budget planning rows—not audited actuals, household tax bills, or all-funds totals.
Budget front brief
For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, the first budget read is a named-row story: Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is 59% of the operating-budget scale, +56 pts versus the peer average; local rank 1 of 21.
Loaded UFB rows use 2025-26 unless a section names another frame; the map routes proposal, peer, inflation, category, student, side-file, and source-row proof.
Budget essentials
For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, these are the UFB-backed answers a resident needs before reading the line tables: the first story route, fair comparison, current proposal, payer mix, category signal, inflation trend, student denominator, and side-file context.
Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is 59% of the operating-budget scale, +56 pts versus the peer average; local rank 1 of 21.
Named rows are contextual source-file lines; many are nested, subtotals, or outside-operating signals.
Source rowsOperating budget per UFB on-roll student is $445,000, $398,324 above the Passaic County average; local rank 1 of 21 among Passaic County districts.
A cost rank is not an efficiency, adequacy, quality, or waste finding.
Peer evidenceOperating budget moves +$3,913,108 from revised/current to proposed, +9 pts of proposed operating scale.
This is not the long-run inflation-adjusted trend or the board/contract/formula reason for the change.
Proposal changesLocal sources supply 100% of proposed General Fund operating revenue.
Revenue shares are not tax bills, sustainability findings, or proof of spending quality.
Revenue familiesTransportation: Current scale: 111% of operating-budget scale, $49,415,033.
Budget families are contextual, nested source-row groups; do not add them into an accounting schedule.
Categories and lines2019-20 to 2025-26: Real operating budget per UFB planning student moved +$105,621 from $339,379 to $445,000.
Real movement is context for the multi-year budget path, not proof of the current proposal’s cause.
Trends and inflationProjected close-year recap balances total $1.8 million.
Side-file and outside-operating rows can be restricted, one-time, projected, or contextual; they are not recurring General Fund spending by themselves.
Side filesEach answer names its comparison, time basis, fund scope, or denominator. The limits are as important as the figures: UFB can surface budget signals, but outside records still have to explain causes, choices, service quality, tax bills, and sustainability.
Peer position snapshot
Before the map, these strips show whether the opening cost, funding, and category signals are near the local pack or visibly apart from it. Gray dots are peer districts, the accent dot is this district, the dashed mark is the Passaic County average, and the short solid tick is the peer median.
Each strip has its own unit and scale; higher is not automatically better or worse. Use the rank as order, then use dot spacing to judge whether the rank reflects a meaningful spread or a tight cluster.
How to read this report
Use these terms before reading any rank, trend, category, source-row, or side-file claim. The report compares several evidence bases; the label tells which one is being used.
| Term | Use it for | Do not read it as |
|---|---|---|
| Comparative cost | NJDOE’s published per-pupil cost line for comparing districts. | A recomputed total-budget-divided-by-enrollment number, a quality rating, or proof that spending is high or low for the same reason everywhere. |
| UFB on-roll | The planning-enrollment denominator inside the User-Friendly Budget. | Fall enrollment, a head-count audit, or the only denominator that can matter for per-student claims. |
| Real dollars | Dollar movement converted to 2025 dollars with CPI-U when the report says real or inflation-adjusted. | The same thing as latest-file proposal changes, which are nominal revised/current-to-proposed budget columns. |
| Operating basis | General Fund operating budget or operating revenue, depending on the measure named in the row. | All-funds revenue, audited financial-statement revenue, or a property-tax bill. |
| Source rows and families | Named UFB revenue and appropriation lines, plus reader-facing groups that make row-level evidence searchable. | An additive accounting schedule; rows can be nested, repeated, or outside the operating budget. |
| Side files | Tax-rate, balance, unusual-item, shared-service, school-resource, and selected administrative-salary context. | Complete payroll, audited savings, spendable cash, recurring revenue, or tax-bill advice. |
| Peer and slice frames | County peers, statewide ranks, budget-model clusters, scale groups, and category slices that test whether a number is unusual for the comparison. | Causal peers, targets, or judgments that a district should match a different district’s budget. |
This key is an orientation layer for the generated budget report. It does not replace the statewide measure guide; it keeps the most common bases visible before the long evidence tables.
Budget thesis and reporting order
Categories and source rows. Categories and named rows are the first explanation layer. Largest high-level use is general current expense, 93% of operating budget; student transportation share is 52%, 45 pts above the Passaic County average; named row Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is +56 pts versus local peers. Treat ordinary nominal spending growth as background unless a peer or slice comparison, category/source row, proposal movement, CPI-adjusted trend, denominator, tax signal, or outside record makes it news.
Start here before writing from a single cost rank.
Use these rows to keep inflation, denominator, and service-load context attached to the claim.
UFB identifies the question; these checks name what has to be verified outside the source file.
This thesis is generated from published UFB rows, CPI-adjusted history where available, local/state comparison sets, and the report’s strongest signal scan. It is a reporting order, not a causal model or a replacement for board records, contracts, tax files, staffing context, and audited financials.
Budget reporting notebook
This notebook turns the ranked UFB leads into a document trail: the signal in this report, the outside records to pull, the interviews or checks to run, and the unsupported reading to block before writing from the numbers.
| Lead | UFB signal | Records to pull | Interviews / checks | Unsupported read to block |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Named UFB rowWhich named source row is large enough versus peers to deserve follow-up?Source rows | +56 ptsTransportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is 59% of the operating-budget scale, +56 pts versus the peer average; local rank 1 of 21. |
|
| Named rows are contextual source-file lines; many are nested, subtotals, or outside-operating signals. |
| 2Funding modelWho pays for the operating budget, and is that funding mix typical for local peers?Revenue families | 100%The largest operating revenue source is local sources, 100% of the proposed operating budget, 34 pts above the Passaic County average. |
|
| Operating revenue is General Fund operating revenue, not all-funds revenue or a tax-bill calculation. |
| 3Spending mixWhich operating-use category makes the district unlike its peers?Spending categories | 52%Student transportation share is 52%, 45 pts above the Passaic County average; local rank 1 of 21. |
|
| High-level use shares share one denominator, but lower-level UFB rows can overlap and should not be summed. |
| 4Real-dollar changeAfter inflation, is the long-run movement about operating scale, denominator movement, or both?Inflation trends | +$8,186,498After inflation, the operating budget changed +$8,186,498 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. |
|
| Real-dollar movement is long-run context; it is separate from the latest proposal-column decision. |
| 5Line movementWhich named source row moved most after inflation across loaded UFB years?Line history | +$4,056,136Largest inflation-adjusted named-line movement: Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities, +$4,056,136 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. |
|
| The selected row is a reporting lead, not a complete explanation of the operating budget change. |
The records and checks are reporting targets, not files contained in the UFB release. They are generated from the same signal ranking as the lead sheet so the report stays anchored in source evidence while making the next journalism step explicit.
Budget machine
The budget story for Northern Region Educational Services Commission starts with cost engine; who pays; cost position. This panel extracts the basic resident-facing read from UFB before the report opens the long proof sections.
The machine read uses UFB summary, revenue, appropriation, pupil-cost, budget-enrollment, reserve, and side-file rows through 2025-26. Money trends use 2025 CPI-U dollars where labeled; proposal rows are nominal revised/current-to-proposed movement.
Budget squeeze explainer
For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, this panel connects the revenue model, recurring cost families, student denominator, current proposal, and local record checks before the report moves into the longer evidence sections.
| Lane | Evidence | Reader read | Check next |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue ceilingTrends and inflation | local sources supply 100% of proposed operating revenue, 34 pts above the Passaic County average; recurring local, state, and federal source summaries moved +$8,186,498 after inflation while operating scale moved +$8,186,498. | This is the first test for a cap-sensitive district: is the recurring operating revenue model keeping pace after inflation, and how dependent is the district on local sources? | Pull the levy-cap worksheet, state-aid notice, cap-bank/waiver rows, tax-base records, and budget presentation before writing a cap-exhaustion or underfunding claim. |
| Cost engineCategories and lines | Transportation: 111% of operating-budget scale, +$5,440,987 after inflation, +101 pts versus Passaic County average, largest row: Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities; Instruction programs: 5% of operating-budget scale, -$800,101 after inflation, -22 pts versus Passaic County average, largest row: Total Instructional Alternative Ed Program; Employee benefits: 9% of operating-budget scale, +$1,949,205 after inflation, -7 pts versus Passaic County average, largest row: Total Personal Services-Employee Benefits; Special education and student supports: 14% of operating-budget scale, +$1,009,303 after inflation, -2 pts versus Passaic County average, largest row: Total Undistributed Expenditures-Speech, OT, PT and Related Services. | This turns the broad spending total into the first recurring categories to inspect. The story may be current scale, peer difference, real movement, or all three. | Pull staffing rosters, placement/tuition schedules, contracts, program schedules, and budget-book narratives before translating category rows into classroom, staffing, or service-impact claims. |
| Students and service loadCosts and students | real operating budget per UFB planning student moved +$105,621 from 2019-20 to 2025-26; UFB planning on-roll moved -7. | This keeps the per-student story from becoming only a dollar story: the denominator, placements, and service-load rows can change the read. | Pull fall enrollment, special-education placement records, IEP/service-obligation context, tuition contracts, transportation records, and staffing schedules before explaining why the load changed. |
| Balancing layerProposal changes | latest proposal moves operating budget +$3,913,108 from revised/current to proposed. | This separates the current budget vote and one-time support rows from the multi-year inflation-adjusted trend. | Pull the adopted budget book, audit, appropriation-of-surplus resolution, reserve schedules, and budget adoption minutes before calling this recurring revenue, audited cash stress, or a complete cut list. |
Money movement uses 2025 CPI-U dollars where the row says after inflation. This is a reporting synthesis, not a deficit finding, tax-bill estimate, quality rating, or claim that a listed category caused a cut.
Budget evidence board
For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, the useful budget read is a sequence: compare the published cost position, explain the category families, check inflation and denominator movement, then verify whether the live proposal continues or complicates that pattern.
$445,000; $398,324 above the Passaic County average.
| Frame | District | Average | Gap | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passaic County districtsclosest local comparison frame | $445,000 | $46,676 | +$398,324 | 1 of 21 |
| All NJ UFB districtsstatewide baseline before narrowing the frame | $445,000 | $39,253 | +$405,747 | 3 of 578 |
| Mostly locally fundedsame funding model, so revenue dependence is not hidden by one rank | $445,000 | $45,725 | +$399,275 | 3 of 379 |
| Under-500 UFB on-rollsimilar UFB planning-enrollment scale | $445,000 | $74,736 | +$370,264 | 3 of 151 |
Transportation: 111% of operating scale, +101 pts vs Passaic County average, +$5.4 million after inflation.
| Family | Latest | Peer gap | Real move | Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TransportationTransportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities | 111% | +101 pts | +$5.4M | +$901K |
| Other named rowsTotal Adult Education-Local | 24% | +21 pts | +$9.1M | +$9.2M |
| Capital, facilities, and debtTotal Capital Outlay | <1% | -9 pts | +$312K | +$240K |
| Local taxes and local sourcesUnrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues | 27% | -35 pts | +$4.0M | +$2.7M |
UFB on-roll moved -7; operating-budget numerator moved +$8.2 million after CPI-U.
| Measure | Value | Moved |
|---|---|---|
| Real operating per UFB on-rollUFB on-roll moved -7; operating-budget numerator moved +$8.2 million after CPI-U. | $339,379 to $445,000 | +$105,621 |
| Operating budget per UFB on-roll studentLatest peer gap +$398,324; first gap was +$297,626. | $445,000 vs $46,676 avg | +$100,698 |
| Student transportation shareLatest peer gap +45 pts; first gap was +53 pts. | 52% vs 7% avg | -8 pts |
| Local operating revenue shareLatest peer gap +34 pts; first gap was +30 pts. | 100% vs 66% avg | +4 pts |
Latest-file proposal rows are nominal and should be read apart from CPI-adjusted history.
| Current-year clue | Move | Op. scale |
|---|---|---|
| Operating budget proposalnominal revised/current-to-proposed movement | +$3.9M | 9% |
| Total Revenues from Local SourcesRevenue; peer net +3 pts of operating scale across 21 districts | +$4.0M | 9% |
| Total General Current ExpenseAppropriation; peer net +3 pts of operating scale across 21 districts | +$3.2M | 7% |
| Total Undistributed ExpendituresAppropriation; peer net +2 pts of operating scale across 21 districts | +$3.0M | 7% |
The board uses the latest UFB year for comparison rows, 2025 CPI-U dollars where it says real or after inflation, proposed operating budget as the category scale denominator, and nominal revised/current-to-proposed dollars for proposal rows. Source-family rows are contextual and can be nested, so this is a reporting map rather than an additive accounting schedule.
Budget operating model
For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, this is the compact operating model behind the long UFB report: scale, payers, uses, real movement, live proposal movement, and checks that can change the interpretation.
$44.5 million proposed General Fund operating budget; $445,000 per UFB planning student; $398,324 above the Passaic County average on operating budget per UFB planning student.
Use this as the recurring operating scale. It is not all funds, audited actual spending, or a household tax bill.
Cost basisMain operating sources: local sources 100% ($44.5 million); 34 pts above the Passaic County average.
Read this as General Fund operating revenue mix. Grants, debt service, capital funds, and tax-rate files sit on different bases.
Revenue familiesLargest visible source families by operating-budget scale: Transportation 111%; Other named rows 24%; Transfers and tuition 14%. Largest visible row: Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities.
Families are source-row groups, not an additive accounting schedule. Use them to decide which category proof section to open first.
Category proofreal operating budget per UFB planning student moved +$105,621 from $339,379 to $445,000; operating-budget numerator moved +$8.2 million after CPI-U while UFB on-roll moved -7; top family movement: Other named rows +$9.1 million after inflation.
This is the guardrail against the generic nominal-spending-growth story: separate inflation, budget numerator, and UFB planning denominator before writing.
Inflation proofoperating budget proposal moved +$3.9 million (9%) from revised/current to proposed; largest visible increase: Total Revenues from Local Sources +$4.0 million.
These are nominal latest-file proposal rows. They should be read beside, not merged into, the CPI-adjusted history.
Proposal prooffund balance / other operating sources is 7 pts below the Passaic County average; rank 20 of 21.
Use these as follow-up checks before writing deficit, tax-bill, service-cut, adequacy, or efficiency claims from UFB alone.
Side-file checksThe model uses 2025-26 UFB rows for the current read, 2025 CPI-U dollars where it says real or after inflation, proposed General Fund operating budget as the common scale where labeled, and Passaic County average for local peer comparisons where enough rows exist.
Budget answer sheet
This answer sheet gives the basic budget read for Northern Region Educational Services Commission before the detailed report opens. It turns the current proposal, peer frame, funding model, spending uses, student/service load, inflation, and side files into direct questions a resident can answer from UFB evidence.
| Question | Answer from UFB | How to read it | Proof |
|---|---|---|---|
| +$3.9Mproposal changeWhat changed in the current proposal?Live proposal | The live proposal changes the operating budget +$3,913,108 (10%) versus the revised/current column. | This is the current budget-year decision point. Long-run charts later in the report convert history to real dollars, but this row is the latest file’s nominal proposal change. | Check proposal changes |
| $445,000op. per UFB on-rollIs the district high, low, or typical against a fair benchmark?Fair comparison | Operating budget per UFB on-roll student is $398,324 above the Passaic County average. | NJDOE comparative-cost rows are limited here, so the report leans on operating scale, UFB planning enrollment, and named rows rather than a single per-pupil headline. | Check peer evidence |
| 100%largest sourceWho pays for the operating budget?Who pays | Local sources supplied the largest operating-revenue share, 34 pts above the Passaic County average. | Revenue mix is the policy frame behind the cost comparison: a locally funded district, a state-aid district, and a district using fund balance can show the same cost number for different reasons. | Check revenue families |
| +101 ptsvs avgWhere does the operating budget go?What money buys | Transportation is the strongest generated spending/category clue: 101 pts above the Passaic County average, +$5,440,987 after inflation from 2019-20 to 2025-26, 111% of operating-budget scale. | This keeps the report out of the generic spending-went-up narrative. The category and named-line sections show which uses are actually large, unusual, or moving. | Check spending categories |
| 100%UFB on-rollWhat student or service-load context changes the read?Students and services | received-from-other-district rows is 100 (100% of UFB on-roll). | Per-pupil comparisons move when the denominator or service load changes. This report keeps fall enrollment, UFB planning enrollment, placements, and student-need rows next to the cost evidence. | Check students and service load |
| +$8,186,498real operating changeWhat changed across loaded UFB years after inflation?What changed after inflation | After inflation, operating-budget scale changed +$8,186,498 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. | This is the long-run context. It is deliberately separate from the latest proposal-column changes so ordinary nominal growth does not masquerade as the budget story. | Check inflation trends |
| $1.8 millionside-file contextWhat else can change the budget story?Reserves and side files | Projected close-year recap balances total $1.8 million. | These rows can explain a budget year without being recurring operating spending. The report keeps fund balance, reserves, recap balances, unusual explanations, shared services, salary rows, and school-resource statements outside additive totals. | Check reserves and side files |
The answer sheet is generated from published UFB rows and local/state comparison sets. It is an evidence map, not a causal model; dollar trend claims are inflation-adjusted only where the text says so, and proposal rows are nominal latest-file movement.
Budget explanation brief
Transportation is the largest current family outside the broad current-expense total, at 111% of operating-budget scale. Transportation has the widest local peer gap, +101 pts against the Passaic County average. Other named rows moved the most after inflation, +$9,105,146 across loaded UFB years.
These are the source-row families where current scale, peer position, inflation-adjusted movement, or the latest proposal move most change the story.
Bars are scaled separately within each scan column; use the printed values for exact cross-column comparisons.
| Signal | Question | Evidence | Use and limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Largest current familyTransportation | Is transportation a visible cost or aid signal relative to other districts? | $49,415,033 in latest source-row dollars; 111% of proposed operating-budget scale.Largest visible row: Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities (Revenue line 250, $26,292,893). | Start here for the part of the budget that has the most current scale before reading smaller line movers.Large does not mean unusual, efficient, inefficient, or recurring; the peer gap and source-row basis still have to be checked.Categories Source rows |
| Widest local peer gapTransportation | Is transportation a visible cost or aid signal relative to other districts? | 111% locally versus 10% for the Passaic County average; gap +101 pts.The family sits above the local peer frame on the same operating-budget-equivalent denominator. | Use this as the clearest category clue that the district differs from nearby districts.A peer gap is not a cause, a quality rating, or proof of waste; it needs program, enrollment, tax, labor, and board-document context.Peer evidence Comparisons Categories |
| Largest real movementOther named rows | Which remaining named rows deserve a closer district-level look? | +$9,105,146 from 2019-20 to 2025-26 after CPI-U adjustment to 2025 dollars.Operating-equivalent share changed +20 pts over the same loaded years. | Use this for the trend question, because it tests whether a category changed after inflation instead of repeating that nominal spending rises.This is not the latest proposal movement and can reflect row availability, program shifts, or denominator changes across loaded UFB years.Trends Categories Source rows |
| Largest current proposal moveLocal taxes and local sources | How much of the budget story is local levy, tuition, fees, or miscellaneous local revenue? | +$2,748,264 from revised/current to proposed in the latest UFB file.That equals +6 pts of proposed operating-budget scale.Largest named proposal row: Unrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues (+$2,748,264 current-to-proposed). | Use this for what the current budget file says is changing now, separate from the multi-year inflation-adjusted trend.Proposal movement is nominal and latest-file only; it is not audited actual spending and should not be added across nested rows.Proposal Source rows |
This brief uses generated UFB source-row families as a reporting triage layer. Latest scale and peer gaps use proposed operating budget as a common denominator; real movement is converted to 2025 dollars with CPI-U; proposal movement is nominal revised/current-to-proposed movement in the latest UFB file. Families are contextual and can be nested, so this is not an additive budget schedule.
Budget story package
For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, start with this budget question: Which named source row is large enough versus peers to deserve follow-up? The package keeps the UFB-supported claim, fair comparison, inflation/category/proposal checks, next reporting move, and blocked overread on the same row.
| Package | What UFB shows | Compare / change | Report / block |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead to testNamed UFB row+56 pts | Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is 59% of the operating-budget scale, +56 pts versus the peer average; local rank 1 of 21.Check: Source rows | Compare againstCompare the same source row against local peers and then inspect the account detail; the row may be a subtotal, restricted source, pass-through, or one-year item.What changes the readReaders can see which line is specific enough to request board backup, account detail, or an agenda item. | Report nextAccount detail for the named source row. Ask who owns the account and what operational event produced the row.Do not writeNamed rows are contextual source-file lines; many are nested, subtotals, or outside-operating signals. |
| Fair comparisonFunding model100% | The largest operating revenue source is local sources, 100% of the proposed operating budget, 34 pts above the Passaic County average.Check: Revenue families | Compare againstCompare operating revenue shares against the Passaic County average; keep state aid, local levy, federal support, and fund balance on their own bases.What changes the readUse this to decide whether local peers, statewide slices, scale, funding model, service load, or source-row context is the fair comparison before quoting a rank. | Report nextState-aid notices and aid-calculation summary. Ask what share is formula aid, levy, reserve use, or one-time support.Do not writeOperating revenue is General Fund operating revenue, not all-funds revenue or a tax-bill calculation. |
| Inflation testTrend and denominator2025 dollars | real operating budget per UFB planning student changed +$105,621 from 2019-20 to 2025-26; UFB planning enrollment changed -7.Check: Inflation trends | Compare againstCompare this with the latest-year Passaic County average, the report map, and the trend section before calling growth the story.What changes the readThis separates nominal spending growth from real per-student movement, denominator change, and the latest proposal columns. | Report nextFirst and latest budget books and budget presentations. Ask which decisions changed between the first and latest loaded UFB years.Do not writeReal-dollar movement is long-run context; it is separate from the latest proposal-column decision. |
| Category explanationTransportation111% | Transportation: $49,415,033 latest source-row dollars, 111% of operating-budget scale; +101 pts versus the Passaic County average; +$5,440,987 after inflation from 2019-20 to 2025-26; +$900,705 latest proposal movement; largest visible row: Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities.Check: Category evidence | Compare againstCompare the same source-family share with the Passaic County average, then check category, peer, trend, proposal, and source-row sections.What changes the readThis is the category/slice evidence that can make a budget story specific; it is not a second total to add to the operating budget. | Report nextAppropriation account detail behind the large category. Ask which program, contract, staffing pattern, or pass-through sits inside the category.Do not writeBudget families can be nested, repeated, or contextual, so they are reporting leads rather than an additive budget schedule. |
| Live proposalUnrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues+$2,748,264 | Unrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues changes +$2,748,264 from revised/current to proposed; +6 pts of operating-budget scale; same-row local peer average movement is +1 pt across 16 peers.Check: Proposal changes | Compare againstCompare the proposal package with the category map and trend bridge before calling it a pivot or continuation.What changes the readThis isolates the live budget decision from the broader real-dollar trend and from nested source-row totals. | Report nextAccount detail for the moving row in first and latest loaded years. Ask which formula, grant, transfer, contract, staffing, or accounting event moved the row.Do not writeProposal rows are nominal latest-file movement, not audited actual spending or a multi-year inflation-adjusted trend. |
Story packages are generated from ranked UFB signals, 2025-dollar inflation checks, local peer and source-family comparisons, latest proposal rows, and side-file cues. They are an assignment path, not a causal finding, quality rating, or additive accounting schedule.
Budget mechanism read
This panel turns the budget evidence for Northern Region Educational Services Commission into mechanisms: who pays; proposal timing; category or slice are the first lanes to test before a reader writes from totals, ranks, or nominal growth.
| Mechanism | District read | Proof already here | Report next | Block this overread |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fallback frameRelative cost | No positive NJDOE comparative-cost line is available, so operating budget per UFB on-roll is the usable per-student scale check: $398,324 above the Passaic County average. | $445,000; +$398,324 versus Passaic County average. Cost basis | Keep the denominator visible before comparing this district with peers. | The recomputed scale check does not replace NJDOE’s published comparative-cost metric. |
| In playWho pays | Local sources supply 100% of proposed General Fund operating revenue; 34 pts above the Passaic County average. | Operating revenue source share from UFB summary rows. Revenue families | Ask whether the cost story is also a local-revenue, state-aid, grant, tax-base, or fund-balance story. | Funding mix is not a tax bill, adequacy judgment, or proof of what the district buys. |
| In playCategory or slice | other named rows moved +$9.1 million after CPI-U from 2019-20 to 2025-26; +21 pts versus the Passaic County average; latest proposal moves other named rows +$2.1 million. Source-family rows can be nested, contextual, or outside recurring operating basis. | Budget-family scan combines latest operating-equivalent scale, local peer gap, CPI-adjusted movement, proposal movement, and largest source-row clues. Category evidence | Report the named row or family before saying total spending is the story. | Budget families and source rows can be nested or contextual, so this is not an additive schedule or causal model. |
| Trend testInflation and denominator | After CPI-U adjustment, operating budget per UFB on-roll moved +$105,621 from 2019-20 to 2025-26; UFB on-roll moved -7. | $339,379 to $445,000 in 2025 dollars per UFB on-roll. Inflation trends | Separate real per-student movement from nominal budget growth and from the latest proposal column. | This is not a current-year cut list, audited actual spending, or proof that services changed. |
| CheckStudents and services | received-from-other-district rows are 100 (100% of UFB on-roll). | received-from-other-district rows: 100. Students and costs | Ask whether per-pupil differences are a denominator, placement, service-load, or cost-row story. | Planning rows are not fall enrollment, service quality, compliance evidence, or student-need proof by themselves. |
| Live decisionProposal timing | operating budget moves +$3,913,108 from revised/current to proposed; 10% latest-file change; top named proposal row is Total Revenues from Local Sources. | +$3.9M; +$4,023,000 in nominal latest-file dollars. Proposal changes | Ask whether the current proposal continues, offsets, or departs from the longer CPI-adjusted trend. | Proposal-column movement is not audited actual spending, long-run inflation movement, or a confirmed cut/addition list. |
| ContextOne-time support | projected close-year recap balances total $1.8 million. | recap balance side file. Reserves and balances | Ask which support is recurring, restricted, already committed, or a one-year budget bridge. | Balance and reserve rows are planned-source or projected-balance context, not audited cash or structural-deficit proof. |
| CheckOutside operating and side files | unusual-item file has 27 positive rows totaling $22.3 million; selected administrative salary side file lists 13 rows. | selected administrative salary side file lists 13 rows. Budget anatomy | Ask whether grants, debt, capital, preschool, unusual items, shared services, or salary side files change the operating story. | Outside-operating and side-file rows are context; they are not recurring General Fund operating spending or audited savings. |
Mechanisms are generated from UFB summary, revenue, appropriation, pupil-cost, budget-enrollment, tax, reserve, and side-file rows. Money trends use 2025 CPI-U dollars where labeled; proposal rows remain nominal latest-file movement.
Cost-position clues
The latest UFB summary does not publish a positive NJDOE comparative-cost value for this district. These clues name the usable denominator, funding, proposal, source-row, service-load, and budget-year evidence before the report moves into full source tables.
| Clue | Evidence | How to read it | Proof |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peer clueListed admin base salaries per UFB on-roll student | $15,018; +$13,652 vs NJ average; rank 5 of 575 | This comparison clue can show what is distinctive, but the latest UFB row does not publish the normal comparative-cost metric. | Costs and students |
| Headline metricNo published comparative-cost line | Latest UFB summary has no positive NJDOE comparative-cost value; UFB on-roll 100 | Do not force this district into the ordinary comparative-cost rank. Use denominator, source-row, service-load, and side-file evidence instead. | Denominators |
| Scale checkOperating budget per UFB on-roll student | $445,000; +$405,747 vs NJ average; rank 3 of 578 | This recomputed operating-budget scale check is the usable per-student comparison here because the latest UFB summary does not publish NJDOE comparative cost. | Cost basis |
| Proposal clueLatest operating proposal | operating budget +$3,913,108 from revised/current to proposed; 10% latest-file change; largest named proposal move: Local sources at +$4,023,000 | The proposal clue is the live nominal budget-year decision. It belongs beside the cost position, but it is separate from CPI-adjusted history and audited actual spending. | Proposal changes |
| Funding clueLocal operating revenue share | 100%; +31 pts vs NJ average; rank 1 of 595 | Funding mix explains who carries the operating budget. It can make the same cost position mean different things, but it does not show what the district buys. | Revenue families |
| Funding clueFund balance / other operating revenue share | 0%; -7 pts vs NJ average; rank 572 of 595 | Funding mix explains who carries the operating budget. It can make the same cost position mean different things, but it does not show what the district buys. | Revenue families |
| Peer clueStudent transportation share | 52%; +46 pts vs NJ average; rank 7 of 592 | This comparison clue can show what is distinctive, but the latest UFB row does not publish the normal comparative-cost metric. | Categories |
| Peer clueOperations and maintenance share | <1%; -8 pts vs NJ average; rank 579 of 587 | This comparison clue can show what is distinctive, but the latest UFB row does not publish the normal comparative-cost metric. | Categories |
| Peer clueEmployee benefits share | 9%; -8 pts vs NJ average; rank 544 of 586 | This comparison clue can show what is distinctive, but the latest UFB row does not publish the normal comparative-cost metric. | Categories |
The clues use New Jersey UFB districts with usable latest-year UFB rows unless noted. Proposal rows are nominal revised/current-to-proposed movement; trend rows use 2025 dollars where labeled. These are reporting leads, not a causal model and not a rating of spending quality.
Cost-position judgment
For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, the cost-position read is without the normal NJDOE comparative-cost line. This ledger decides whether the visible UFB signals line up with that read, complicate it, or leave the explanation outside the budget files.
| Judgment | Evidence | Reader take | Next check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost story | The latest UFB summary lacks a positive NJDOE comparative-cost row; UFB on-roll is 100. | Do not force a high-cost or low-cost story. Use operating scale, denominator, source-row, service-load, proposal, and side-file evidence instead. | Denominators |
| Distinctive despite cost rank | Operating budget per UFB on-roll student: $445,000 (+$398,324 vs Passaic County average; rank 1 of 21); Student transportation share: 52% (+45 pts vs Passaic County average; rank 1 of 21); Local operating revenue share: 100% (+34 pts vs Passaic County average; rank 1 of 21). | These are the strongest peer-relative clues even though the headline cost rank is not itself a sharp high/low story. | Category and funding evidence |
| Named row to test | Total Tax Levy: 0% of operating scale; -58 pts vs Passaic County average; rank 21 of 21. | A named UFB row can make the story concrete. It still may be nested, contextual, or outside the recurring operating basis, so it needs the source-row proof section. | Source rows |
| Generated story lane | other named rows moved +$9.1 million after CPI-U from 2019-20 to 2025-26; +21 pts versus the Passaic County average; latest proposal moves other named rows +$2.1 million. Source-family rows can be nested, contextual, or outside recurring operating basis. | This is the strongest generated source-family route. Use it to decide what to report next, not as an accounting total or causal model. | Category evidence |
| Live decision point | operating budget +$3,913,108 from revised/current to proposed; 10% latest-file change. | This is a nominal current-proposal decision, not the inflation-adjusted history and not audited actual spending. | Proposal changes |
| Still unresolved | Account detail for the named source row. Ask who owns the account and what operational event produced the row. | UFB can rank and compare the signal, but it still does not prove cause, adequacy, intent, quality, or taxpayer impact. Named rows are contextual source-file lines; many are nested, subtotals, or outside-operating signals. | Source rows |
The ledger uses Passaic County districts with usable latest-year UFB rows unless the row names another frame. It is a reporting synthesis, not an efficiency rating, adequacy claim, or causal model.
Budget report section
What is the short version, what can UFB prove, which signals deserve the first read, and which simple reads need a second signal?
What explains this budget
Named UFB row. Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is 59% of the operating-budget scale, +56 pts versus the peer average; local rank 1 of 21.
AskWhich named source row is large enough versus peers to deserve follow-up?Do not overreadNamed rows are contextual source-file lines; many are nested, subtotals, or outside-operating signals.Check: Source rowsThese are generated reporting leads ranked from the latest UFB row scans, county comparisons, planning-enrollment rows, and real-dollar trend checks. The question and counter-reading keep each lead from becoming a causal claim before the full report evidence is checked.
Budget reading memo
The useful budget read for Northern Region Educational Services Commission is not a single spending-up sentence or a lone rank. Test this question first: Which named source row is large enough versus peers to deserve follow-up? Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is 59% of the operating-budget scale, +56 pts versus the peer average; local rank 1 of 21.
After inflation, operating budget per UFB planning student changed +$105,621 from 2019-20 to 2025-26; UFB planning enrollment changed -7. The latest UFB proposal column changes the operating budget +$3,913,108 from revised/current to proposed. Those facts matter, but they should travel with the named UFB row question instead of becoming the whole story.
Check: Source rowsPull the budget-book narrative, account detail, and board agenda items behind the named row; UFB confirms scale, not the operational reason.
| Context | UFB signal | Why it changes the read | Guardrail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Funding modelRevenue families | The largest operating revenue source is local sources, 100% of the proposed operating budget, 34 pts above the Passaic County average. | Readers can separate a budget that is locally funded, state-aid driven, federally supported, or temporarily balanced by reserves before judging the same cost number. | Operating revenue is General Fund operating revenue, not all-funds revenue or a tax-bill calculation. |
| Spending mixSpending categories | Student transportation share is 52%, 45 pts above the Passaic County average; local rank 1 of 21. | Readers can move from one total budget number to the source row, program, transfer, or cost family that actually needs explanation. | High-level use shares share one denominator, but lower-level UFB rows can overlap and should not be summed. |
| Real-dollar changeInflation trends | After inflation, the operating budget changed +$8,186,498 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. | Readers can compare loaded UFB years after inflation without mixing that trend with the latest proposal columns. | Real-dollar movement is long-run context; it is separate from the latest proposal-column decision. |
This memo is generated from ranked UFB signals, local peer context, loaded-year inflation checks, proposal columns, and side-file evidence. It is an editorial route through the evidence, not a causal finding; Named rows are contextual source-file lines; many are nested, subtotals, or outside-operating signals.
Question-to-reporting path
The first resident question for Northern Region Educational Services Commission is Which named source row is large enough versus peers to deserve follow-up? This path keeps the strongest UFB clues beside the first fair comparison, the records to pull, and the shortcut to block before writing.
| Reader question | UFB clue | First comparison | Reporting move |
|---|---|---|---|
| Named UFB rowWhich named source row is large enough versus peers to deserve follow-up? | Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is 59% of the operating-budget scale, +56 pts versus the peer average; local rank 1 of 21.Contextual UFB revenue or appropriation source row, operating-budget-equivalent scale, and same-row peer scan. | Compare the same source row against local peers and then inspect the account detail; the row may be a subtotal, restricted source, pass-through, or one-year item.Check: Source rows | Pull or ask
|
| Funding modelWho pays for the operating budget, and is that funding mix typical for local peers? | The largest operating revenue source is local sources, 100% of the proposed operating budget, 34 pts above the Passaic County average.Latest General Fund operating revenue summary, operating-budget denominator, and local peer source-share context. | Compare operating revenue shares against the Passaic County average; keep state aid, local levy, federal support, and fund balance on their own bases.Check: Revenue families | Pull or ask
|
| Spending mixWhich operating-use category makes the district unlike its peers? | Student transportation share is 52%, 45 pts above the Passaic County average; local rank 1 of 21.High-level General Fund appropriation rows and operating-budget-share peer comparisons. | Compare operating-use shares and named source rows with the Passaic County average; lower-level rows can be nested, repeated, or outside the operating fund.Check: Spending categories | Pull or ask
|
| Real-dollar changeAfter inflation, is the long-run movement about operating scale, denominator movement, or both? | After inflation, the operating budget changed +$8,186,498 from 2019-20 to 2025-26.Loaded UFB history converted to 2025 dollars before first-to-latest comparison. | Compare the CPI-adjusted loaded-year movement with the latest proposal columns and UFB planning-enrollment denominator before calling it a policy shift.Check: Inflation trends | Pull or ask
|
This path is generated from the same ranked UFB signals as the budget memo and claim audit. It is a reporting crosswalk, not a finding that one row caused another.
Public hearing agenda
This turns the budget report into meeting questions: the generated UFB signal, the local record or explanation to ask for, the proof section to open, and the reading that should be blocked before a resident or reporter writes from the numbers.
| Question | UFB signal | Ask for / check | Proof | Block this read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current proposalWhich proposed changes are recurring, which are one-time or restricted, and what local action explains the largest named row? | Operating proposal changes +$3,913,108 from revised/current to proposed. Top named row: Unrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues +$2,748,264 (Revenue line 300). | Budget-hearing presentation, revised/current-to-proposed detail, board resolutions, and the contract, grant, tuition, transfer, or staffing memo behind the largest changed row. | Proposal changes | Do not describe nominal proposal-column movement as the CPI-adjusted trend or as an audited spending result. |
| Categories and linesWhich category or source family is actually driving the story, and which account, program, restriction, or transfer sits underneath it? | Transportation: $49,415,033; 111% of operating-budget scale; +101 pts versus Passaic County average; +$5,440,987 after inflation from 2019-20 to 2025-26; largest row: Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities. | Account detail for the selected family, program or staffing schedules, contract or transfer documents, grant/restriction notes, and board packet explanations for the largest row. | Category evidence | Do not add budget families or lower-level rows together; many are nested, contextual, or outside recurring operating basis. |
| Inflation and denominatorIs the multi-year movement a real spending change, a planning-enrollment denominator change, a category mix change, or a one-year row? | Real operating budget changed +$8,186,498 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. Real operating budget per UFB planning student changed +$105,621. UFB planning on-roll changed -7. | First and latest budget books, enrollment projection memos, budget adoption minutes, account-level change notes, and any one-time grant, reserve, capital, or debt documents. | Trends and inflation | Do not make ordinary nominal growth the story until CPI-U, planning enrollment, peers, and category rows have been checked. |
| Students and servicesWhich enrollment, placement, tuition, preschool, transportation, or service-plan assumption changes the per-student read? | UFB planning on-roll 100. | Enrollment projection worksheet, fall-enrollment comparison, placement and tuition schedules, transportation contracts, preschool/service-plan notes, and receiving/sending district records. | Costs and students | Do not treat UFB planning rows as fall enrollment, direct student need, compliance, or service quality proof. |
| Reserves and side filesWhich balance, reserve, one-time, shared-service, unusual, grant, capital, or debt rows belong in the story, and which are outside recurring operating? | Largest projected balance row: Unrestricted-General Operating Budget at $1.7 million. Positive unusual-item explanations total $22.3 million. | Audit or ACFR fund-balance note, reserve-transfer approvals, unusual-item explanations, shared-service agreements, grant award letters, capital project schedules, and debt-service documents. | Side files | Do not treat planned balance or reserve rows as audited cash, recurring revenue, or a structural-deficit finding; do not sum side files into operating spending. |
This is generated from the same UFB rows as the report, but the records named here are outside the UFB release. The table is a civic checklist, not a claim that the outside records already prove the explanation.
Budget news judgment
This filter labels what is background, what the UFB rows can support now, what needs a second signal, and what still requires outside reporting before the budget story is written.
| Judgment | Evidence | Next step | Do not write |
|---|---|---|---|
| BackgroundNominal budget growth or a plain spending-up sentence. | Nominal operating budget moved +$15,663,215 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. The report tests that against CPI-U, UFB planning enrollment, and peer evidence: real operating budget per UFB planning student moved +$105,621. | Move to real dollars, fair peer/slice comparisons, category/source-family evidence, proposal columns, or side-file context before making it the story.Trends and inflation | Do not publish a generic 'spending went up' read as the budget story unless the second signal explains why it matters. |
| UFB-ready factThe latest proposal column changed. | Proposed operating budget changed +$3,913,108 from revised/current to proposed in the latest UFB file. | Report it as nominal current-proposal movement, then inspect named revenue and appropriation rows.Proposal changes | Do not mix this latest-file movement with the CPI-adjusted multi-year trend. |
| Reportable UFB signalWhich named source row is large enough versus peers to deserve follow-up? | Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is 59% of the operating-budget scale, +56 pts versus the peer average; local rank 1 of 21. Evidence basis: Contextual UFB revenue or appropriation source row, operating-budget-equivalent scale, and same-row peer scan. | Use this as the first local budget question, then check the linked proof section.Source rows | Named rows are contextual source-file lines; many are nested, subtotals, or outside-operating signals. |
| Second-signal checkWho pays for the operating budget, and is that funding mix typical for local peers? | The largest operating revenue source is local sources, 100% of the proposed operating budget, 34 pts above the Passaic County average. Evidence basis: Latest General Fund operating revenue summary, operating-budget denominator, and local peer source-share context. | Carry this beside the lead so the first read is tested against another denominator, file, or comparison frame.Revenue families | Operating revenue is General Fund operating revenue, not all-funds revenue or a tax-bill calculation. |
| Needs reportingTurn the named ufb row signal into a local explanation. | Account detail for the named source row. Board packet or resolution tied to the account. Ask who owns the account and what operational event produced the row. | Pull the budget-book narrative, account detail, and board agenda items behind the named row; UFB confirms scale, not the operational reason.Source rows | A large named row can be a subtotal, nested line, restricted source, transfer, or one-year accounting change. |
| Blocked shortcutCause, waste, adequacy, efficiency, intent, quality, or blame. | UFB rows can flag a reportable budget signal; they do not prove why it happened or whether it is good policy. | Use board documents, contracts, tax records, staffing/program records, audits, and interviews before writing causal language.Source rows | Do not turn named ufb row into a causal or quality claim from UFB alone. |
The filter is generated from the same ranked UFB evidence as the reading memo, claim audit, and reporting notebook. It is a news judgment screen, not a causal model or a quality rating.
Budget diagnosis
For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, the strongest generated read is what money buys. The table ranks the explanatory lanes before the report opens the long evidence sections, so the budget is not reduced to ordinary per-pupil growth or a single cost rank.
| Lane | Evidence | What it explains | What it cannot prove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dominant first readWhat money buysCategories and lines | general current expense is the largest high-level use at 93% of operating budget; student transportation share is 52%, 45 pts above the Passaic County average; named row Total Tax Levy is -58 pts versus local peers. | Which spending category, pupil-cost row, or named source row turns the broad cost number into a concrete budget story. | A program audit, a complete causal bridge, or an additive sum of nested UFB rows. |
| Strong supporting readCost positionPeer evidence | operating budget per UFB on-roll is $445,000, $398,324 above the Passaic County average. | Whether the district is actually unusual after the local peer frame and operating denominator are named. | Quality, efficiency, adequacy, waste, or the cause of the rank. |
| Strong supporting readWho paysRevenue families | local sources supply 100% of General Fund operating revenue; that source share is 34 pts above the Passaic County average. | Why the same cost figure can mean different things in a state-funded, locally funded, federally supported, or balance-supported district. | A tax bill, a sustainability finding, or proof that source shares explain spending quality. |
| Context to carryTrend and denominatorTrends and inflation | operating scale changed +$8,186,498 in 2025 dollars from 2019-20 to 2025-26; UFB planning on-roll changed -7. | Whether the background movement is real operating scale, published comparative cost, enrollment arithmetic, or a mix. | A current-year decision, or proof that inflation, enrollment, labor, or programs caused the movement. |
| Context to carryCurrent proposalProposal changes | operating budget changes +$3,913,108 from revised/current to proposed; largest named proposal movement is Local sources at +$4,023,000. | What the latest UFB file says is changing now, in nominal revised/current-to-proposed dollars. | The long-run inflation-adjusted trend, or the board/contract/formula reason the proposal changed. |
| Context to carryReserves and side filesSide files | projected close-year recap balances total $1.8 million; positive unusual-item explanations total $22.3 million. | Whether reserve use, projected balances, unusual explanations, or shared-service entries should travel with the operating story. | Recurring revenue, audited cash, complete savings, or a structural-deficit finding. |
| Context to carryStudents and service loadCosts and students | received-from-other-district planning rows equal 100% of UFB on-roll. | Whether the per-student read is really about the denominator, placements, special education, or student-flow rows. | Fall enrollment, service severity, staffing need, service quality, or compliance. |
The diagnosis is generated from published UFB summary, source rows, local peer comparisons, side files, and loaded-year movement. It ranks evidence for reporting priority; it is not a causal model, quality rating, or accounting equation.
Comparison brief
This table puts the published cost line into the comparison frames that matter first: named local peers, all NJ districts, funding model, district scale, cost band, and any high-signal service or category slice. It is a triage layer before the detailed peer strips, slice panels, and source rows.
Comparison verdictConsistently above comparison frames. The operating budget per ufb on-roll student is above in 4 frames across the 4 front comparison frames shown.
Frame to checkAll NJ UFB districts: +$405,747 vs NJ average; rank 3 of 578.
Reporting useUse the detailed proof to test whether category, funding, or student-load rows explain the position. Open proof
Read across comparison frames before treating one rank as the story. These rows use NJDOE comparative cost when available, then operating cost per UFB on-roll as the fallback.
| Frame | District | Comparison | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passaic County districtsClosest named local benchmark before any statewide ranking.Operating budget per UFB on-roll student | $445,0001 of 21 | $46,676Passaic County average | +$398,324 |
| All NJ UFB districtsBroad statewide baseline; useful, but not a fair peer group by itself.Operating budget per UFB on-roll student | $445,0003 of 578 | $39,253NJ average | +$405,747 |
| Mostly locally funded districtsFunding model changes what the same per-pupil cost can mean.Operating budget per UFB on-roll student | $445,0003 of 379 | $45,725slice average | +$399,275 |
| Under-500 UFB on-roll districtsScale helps separate large-system budgets from fixed-cost small-district pressure.Operating budget per UFB on-roll student | $445,0003 of 151 | $74,736slice average | +$370,264 |
| Frame | District | Comparison | Named check | How to use it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passaic County districtsClosest named local benchmark before any statewide ranking. | $445,0001 of 21 | $46,676Passaic County average; +$398,324 | Next higher: none in this frame; Next lower: Passaic Co Manchester Reg $40,847. | Closest named local benchmark before any statewide ranking.Open proof |
| All NJ UFB districtsBroad statewide baseline; useful, but not a fair peer group by itself. | $445,0003 of 578 | $39,253NJ average; +$405,747 | Next higher: Monmouth-Ocean Ed Ser Com $2,220,765; Next lower: Somerset Co Ed Serv Comm $317,563. | Broad statewide baseline; useful, but not a fair peer group by itself.Open proof |
| Mostly locally funded districtsFunding model changes what the same per-pupil cost can mean. | $445,0003 of 379 | $45,725slice average; +$399,275 | Next higher: Monmouth-Ocean Ed Ser Com $2,220,765; Next lower: Somerset Co Ed Serv Comm $317,563. | Funding model changes what the same per-pupil cost can mean. Secondary clue: Local operating revenue share is 100%, 16 pts above the slice average.Open proof |
| Under-500 UFB on-roll districtsScale helps separate large-system budgets from fixed-cost small-district pressure. | $445,0003 of 151 | $74,736slice average; +$370,264 | Next higher: Monmouth-Ocean Ed Ser Com $2,220,765; Next lower: Somerset Co Ed Serv Comm $317,563. | Scale helps separate large-system budgets from fixed-cost small-district pressure.Open proof |
Frames overlap and keep their own denominators. "Next higher" and "next lower" are numeric positions on the selected measure, not judgments about efficiency, adequacy, or quality.
Budget story spine
This scan-first table turns the strongest generated signals into a proof path. It keeps the claim, UFB evidence, fair comparison, outside reporting need, and counter-reading in one row before the report opens the longer evidence sections.
| Story path | UFB proof | Comparison / proof | Outside reporting | Do not overread |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Named UFB rowWhich named source row is large enough versus peers to deserve follow-up? | +56 ptsTransportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is 59% of the operating-budget scale, +56 pts versus the peer average; local rank 1 of 21. | Source rowsPassaic County average where local peer rows are usable; statewide and slice frames where the local peer set is incomplete. | Pull the budget-book narrative, account detail, and board agenda items behind the named row; UFB confirms scale, not the operational reason. | Named rows are contextual source-file lines; many are nested, subtotals, or outside-operating signals. |
| Funding modelWho pays for the operating budget, and is that funding mix typical for local peers? | 100%The largest operating revenue source is local sources, 100% of the proposed operating budget, 34 pts above the Passaic County average. | Revenue familiesPassaic County average where local peer rows are usable; statewide and slice frames where the local peer set is incomplete. | Read aid notices, budget-hearing materials, and board minutes to separate formula aid, one-time support, reserve use, and local decisions. | Operating revenue is General Fund operating revenue, not all-funds revenue or a tax-bill calculation. |
| Spending mixWhich operating-use category makes the district unlike its peers? | 52%Student transportation share is 52%, 45 pts above the Passaic County average; local rank 1 of 21. | Spending categoriesPassaic County average where local peer rows are usable; statewide and slice frames where the local peer set is incomplete. | Identify the program, contract, transfer recipient, school allocation, or staffing pattern behind the category before attaching a policy explanation. | High-level use shares share one denominator, but lower-level UFB rows can overlap and should not be summed. |
| Real-dollar changeAfter inflation, is the long-run movement about operating scale, denominator movement, or both? | +$8,186,498After inflation, the operating budget changed +$8,186,498 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. | Inflation trendsPassaic County average where local peer rows are usable; statewide and slice frames where the local peer set is incomplete. | Pin the movement to the actual, revised, and proposed columns plus outside events before calling it a policy change. | Real-dollar movement is long-run context; it is separate from the latest proposal-column decision. |
| Line movementWhich named source row moved most after inflation across loaded UFB years? | +$4,056,136Largest inflation-adjusted named-line movement: Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities, +$4,056,136 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. | Line historyPassaic County average where local peer rows are usable; statewide and slice frames where the local peer set is incomplete. | Find the formula, grant, transfer, contract, staffing, or accounting event behind the named row movement. | The selected row is a reporting lead, not a complete explanation of the operating budget change. |
The spine is generated from latest-year peer gaps, named UFB rows, planning-enrollment evidence, side files, and real-dollar trend checks. It ranks reportable evidence paths, not spending quality or causal certainty.
Budget storylines to test
These are not finished articles. They are generated story packages that turn the strongest UFB signals into a responsible reporting route: the working nut graf, why the claim matters to readers, the proof inside UFB, the outside record to pull next, and the sentence not to write yet.
Working nut graf. For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, the UFB-supported story to test is this: Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is 59% of the operating-budget scale, +56 pts versus the peer average; local rank 1 of 21. The reporting question is: Which named source row is large enough versus peers to deserve follow-up?
Why readers careReaders can see which line is specific enough to request board backup, account detail, or an agenda item.Proof in UFBContextual UFB revenue or appropriation source row, operating-budget-equivalent scale, and same-row peer scan. Source rowsReport nextPull the budget-book narrative, account detail, and board agenda items behind the named row; UFB confirms scale, not the operational reason.Do not write yetA large named row can be a subtotal, nested line, restricted source, transfer, or one-year accounting change.Working nut graf. For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, the UFB-supported story to test is this: The largest operating revenue source is local sources, 100% of the proposed operating budget, 34 pts above the Passaic County average. The reporting question is: Who pays for the operating budget, and is that funding mix typical for local peers?
Why readers careReaders can separate a budget that is locally funded, state-aid driven, federally supported, or temporarily balanced by reserves before judging the same cost number.Proof in UFBLatest General Fund operating revenue summary, operating-budget denominator, and local peer source-share context. Revenue familiesReport nextRead aid notices, budget-hearing materials, and board minutes to separate formula aid, one-time support, reserve use, and local decisions.Do not write yetA state-funded, locally funded, or fund-balance-heavy budget can produce the same cost figure for different reasons.Working nut graf. For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, the UFB-supported story to test is this: Student transportation share is 52%, 45 pts above the Passaic County average; local rank 1 of 21. The reporting question is: Which operating-use category makes the district unlike its peers?
Why readers careReaders can move from one total budget number to the source row, program, transfer, or cost family that actually needs explanation.Proof in UFBHigh-level General Fund appropriation rows and operating-budget-share peer comparisons. Spending categoriesReport nextIdentify the program, contract, transfer recipient, school allocation, or staffing pattern behind the category before attaching a policy explanation.Do not write yetA large share can be a pass-through, required service, accounting structure, or policy choice; the category label alone does not say which.Working nut graf. For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, the UFB-supported story to test is this: After inflation, the operating budget changed +$8,186,498 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. The reporting question is: After inflation, is the long-run movement about operating scale, denominator movement, or both?
Why readers careReaders can compare loaded UFB years after inflation without mixing that trend with the latest proposal columns.Proof in UFBLoaded UFB history converted to 2025 dollars before first-to-latest comparison. Inflation trendsReport nextPin the movement to the actual, revised, and proposed columns plus outside events before calling it a policy change.Do not write yetInflation-adjusted growth can come from the budget numerator, the UFB denominator, or one-time rows.Storylines are ranked from local peer gaps, source-row scale, planning-enrollment rows, side-file signals, proposal movement, and CPI-adjusted loaded-year checks. Money bases, fund scope, and denominators stay attached to each route; comparative cost remains NJDOE’s published metric.
Budget claim audit
This audit turns the report’s strongest signals into sentence-level budget claims. It separates what the UFB rows support from what still requires board materials, contracts, audits, tax records, staffing context, program records, or interviews.
| Claim status | Safe wording | Evidence basis | Still not proven | Proof / next check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFB-supported fact | The latest UFB file shows the proposed operating budget changes +$3,913,108 from the revised/current column to the proposed column. | Latest-year UFB revised/current and proposed operating-budget columns; nominal dollars. | This is the live proposal move, not the inflation-adjusted long-run trend or the reason the proposal changed. | Proposal changes |
| UFB-supported fact | Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is 59% of the operating-budget scale, +56 pts versus the peer average; local rank 1 of 21. | Contextual UFB revenue or appropriation source row, operating-budget-equivalent scale, and same-row peer scan. | Named rows are contextual source-file lines; many are nested, subtotals, or outside-operating signals. | Source rows |
| UFB-supported fact | The largest operating revenue source is local sources, 100% of the proposed operating budget, 34 pts above the Passaic County average. | Latest General Fund operating revenue summary, operating-budget denominator, and local peer source-share context. | Operating revenue is General Fund operating revenue, not all-funds revenue or a tax-bill calculation. | Revenue families |
| UFB-supported fact | Student transportation share is 52%, 45 pts above the Passaic County average; local rank 1 of 21. | High-level General Fund appropriation rows and operating-budget-share peer comparisons. | High-level use shares share one denominator, but lower-level UFB rows can overlap and should not be summed. | Spending categories |
| UFB-supported fact | After inflation, the operating budget changed +$8,186,498 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. | Loaded UFB history converted to 2025 dollars before first-to-latest comparison. | Real-dollar movement is long-run context; it is separate from the latest proposal-column decision. | Inflation trends |
| UFB-supported fact | Largest inflation-adjusted named-line movement: Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities, +$4,056,136 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. | Selected UFB revenue or appropriation row history converted to 2025 dollars. | The selected row is a reporting lead, not a complete explanation of the operating budget change. | Line history |
| Needs outside reporting | Pull the budget-book narrative, account detail, and board agenda items behind the named row; UFB confirms scale, not the operational reason. | Board materials, audits, contracts, tax records, staffing context, program records, or interviews outside the UFB files. | Named rows are contextual source-file lines; many are nested, subtotals, or outside-operating signals. | Source rows |
| Needs outside reporting | Read aid notices, budget-hearing materials, and board minutes to separate formula aid, one-time support, reserve use, and local decisions. | Board materials, audits, contracts, tax records, staffing context, program records, or interviews outside the UFB files. | Operating revenue is General Fund operating revenue, not all-funds revenue or a tax-bill calculation. | Revenue families |
| Unsupported shortcut | Do not turn the named ufb row signal into a claim about waste, adequacy, intent, quality, or cause without the outside reporting step. | Not established by UFB rows alone. | A large named row can be a subtotal, nested line, restricted source, transfer, or one-year accounting change. | Source rows |
Rows are generated from latest-year peer gaps, named UFB rows, planning-enrollment evidence, side files, latest-file proposal columns, and inflation-adjusted trend checks. Safe wording is the strongest UFB-supported sentence before outside reporting, not a finished story.
Comparison movement brief
This table separates the generic spending-up-over-time story from the district-specific comparison story. It asks whether selected cost, funding, tax, category, and service-load measures moved toward or away from the Passaic County average from 2019-20 to 2025-26.
| Measure | First gap | Latest gap | Read the movement | Check next |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating budget per UFB on-roll student2019-20 to 2025-26 | +$297,6262019-20 vs local peer average | +$398,3242025-26 vs local peer average | The measure moved farther above the Passaic County average; the gap moved +$100,698. | Peer trend proof |
| Student transportation share2019-20 to 2025-26 | +53 pts2019-20 vs local peer average | +45 pts2025-26 vs local peer average | The measure moved closer to the Passaic County average; the gap moved -8 pts. | Category evidence |
| Local operating revenue share2019-20 to 2025-26 | +30 pts2019-20 vs local peer average | +34 pts2025-26 vs local peer average | The measure moved farther above the Passaic County average; the gap moved +4 pts. | Funding and categories |
| Operations and maintenance share2019-20 to 2025-26 | -6 pts2019-20 vs local peer average | -8 pts2025-26 vs local peer average | The measure moved farther below the Passaic County average; the gap moved -2 pts. | Category evidence |
| Fund balance / other operating revenue share2019-20 to 2025-26 | -5 pts2019-20 vs local peer average | -7 pts2025-26 vs local peer average | The measure moved farther below the Passaic County average; the gap moved -2 pts. | Funding and categories |
| Employee benefits share2019-20 to 2025-26 | -10 pts2019-20 vs local peer average | -7 pts2025-26 vs local peer average | The measure moved closer to the Passaic County average; the gap moved +3 pts. | Category evidence |
| Special-education on-roll planning share2019-20 to 2023-24 | -8 pts2019-20 vs local peer average | -15 pts2023-24 vs local peer average | The measure moved farther below the Passaic County average; the gap moved -7 pts. | Student and service load |
Money measures are converted to 2025 dollars before peer gaps are compared. This is a direction-of-comparison brief, not a causal test; a widening or narrowing gap still needs category, denominator, tax, service-load, and source-row evidence.
Operating story basis
This table classifies the latest UFB evidence before the report asks what the budget means. It separates recurring operating-budget signals from the live proposal, reserve and carryover sources, side-file context, and outside-operating rows before comparing this district with the Passaic County average or statewide slices.
| Budget basis | What UFB shows | Use it to say | Do not read it as |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recurring operating baseRevenue and use categories | proposed operating budget $44,500,000; local sources supply 100% of operating revenue; general current expense is 93% of operating usesScale: $44.5 million | Use for the district’s main current-year operating story: who funds the General Fund operating budget and which high-level uses dominate it. | Do not mix this with all-funds grants, debt, capital, or side-file rows as though everything recurs on the same basis. |
| Current proposal movementProposal changes | Local sources changes +$4,023,000 from revised/current to proposedScale: 9% of operating budget | Use for what the latest budget proposal changes now, in nominal latest-file dollars. | Do not treat this as the inflation-adjusted long-run trend, and do not add overlapping source rows into one total. |
| Side-file contextSide files | projected close-year recap balances $1,755,091; unusual-item explanations $22,303,658Scale: 50% | Use to explain tax basis, projected balances, district-entered unusual explanations, and shared-service context beside the operating story. | Do not read side-file rows as audited operating totals, complete payroll, audited savings, or tax-bill advice. |
The recurring row uses the proposed General Fund operating budget as the common basis. Proposal movement is nominal revised/current-to-proposed evidence; trend panels convert dollars to 2025 only where labeled. Reserve, recap, unusual-item, shared-service, tax, and outside-operating rows are kept separate because they answer different journalism questions.
Structural squeeze test
The squeeze test asks whether Northern Region Educational Services Commission has the pattern a budget story usually needs: main operating sources, operating-use families, one-time support, denominator or service-load rows, and peer context pointing toward recurring pressure. It also marks what UFB cannot prove.
| Test | UFB evidence | Safe read | Outside reporting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recurring-source testTrends and inflation | Local, state, and federal operating-source summaries moved +$8,186,498 after inflation from 2019-20 to 2025-26; those summaries equal 100% of the latest proposed operating budget; operating-budget scale moved +$8,186,498, about even with that source movement. | Use this to test whether the main recurring operating sources kept pace with operating scale after CPI-U. It is not a tax-cap or adequacy finding by itself. | Pull the levy-cap worksheet, state-aid notice, cap-bank/waiver rows, budget book, and board presentation before writing a cap-limited or underfunded-budget claim. |
| Operating-use testCategories and lines | Transportation moved +$1,384,850 after inflation from 2019-20 to 2025-26; latest scale is 52% of proposed operating budget; 45 pts above the Passaic County average; largest latest source row: Total Undistributed Expenditures-Student Transportation Services. | Use this as the first appropriation/use family to inspect. Rows can still be nested, so this does not prove a single driver or an additive subtotal. | Pull staffing rosters, contracts, placement details, program schedules, and budget-book narratives before assigning cause or judging service quality. |
| Denominator and service-load testCosts and students | UFB planning on-roll moved -7. | Use this to keep per-pupil cost and category movement tied to the planning denominator and visible service-load rows. | Pull fall enrollment, special-education placement records, IEP/service obligations, tuition contracts, and staffing schedules before explaining why the load changed. |
| Peer-frame testPeer evidence | Operating budget per UFB on-roll student is $445,000, +$398,324 vs Passaic County average; Local operating revenue share is 100%, +34 pts vs Passaic County average. | Use the peer frame to decide whether the squeeze signal is district-specific, common among local peers, or mainly a funding-model comparison. | Pull comparable districts' budget books, staffing/service context, and tax-base records before treating a rank as efficiency, adequacy, or resident impact. |
| Outside-record gapStory checks | UFB rows can show loaded-year source movement, operating-use movement, limited-source rows, service-load denominators, and peer position through 2025-26. | Use UFB to form a recurring-pressure hypothesis and to say which signals point the same direction. Do not write future deficit, statutory cap exhaustion, layoffs, service cuts, or intent from UFB alone. | Pull the board budget book, public-hearing deck, tax levy cap calculation, state aid notice, collective-bargaining and staffing records, audit, and any projected-gap or cut-list documents. |
Dollar movement uses 2025 CPI-U dollars where the row says after inflation. The test is a reporting checklist, not a structural-deficit finding, tax-bill estimate, service-quality rating, or levy-cap calculation.
Budget flow bridge
This table keeps the budget report from reading as disconnected panels. It puts the relative cost frame, money in, money out, proposal movement, outside-operating rows, side files, and student denominator in one scan before the report compares this district with the Passaic County average and the statewide slices below.
| Budget path | District scale | Use it to read | Compare / prove | Do not overread |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative cost framePeer evidence | operating budget per UFB on-roll $445,000 | Start with whether the published cost position still looks unusual after the operating denominator and peer frame are named. | operating per UFB on-roll +$398,324 vs Passaic County average | Do not turn a high or low cost position into quality, efficiency, or causality without the category, denominator, tax, and side-file checks below. |
| Money inRevenue families | Local sources: $44.5 million (100%) | Use this as the recurring General Fund operating-revenue basis: who funds the operating budget before all-funds, tax-rate, and reserve rows enter. | +34 pts vs Passaic County average; rank 1 of 21 | Do not call this all-funds revenue or a household tax bill; grants, debt, capital, and tax side files sit on different bases. |
| Money outCategories | General current expense: $41.4 million (93%); Special schools: $2.8 million (6%); Capital outlay: $312,000 (<1%) | Use this as the high-level operating-use basis before reading nested line rows or standardized pupil-cost rows. | +3 pts vs Passaic County average; rank 14 of 21 | Do not add high-level rows, lower-level detail rows, and pupil-cost rows into one spending decomposition; they overlap. |
| Live proposal movementProposal changes | operating budget +$3,913,108; Local sources +$4,023,000 | Use this for what the latest UFB file says is changing from revised/current to proposed, in nominal latest-file dollars. | +9 pts of operating scale; same-row peer context appears in the proposal-driver table. | Do not treat proposal movement as the long-run trend; trend panels convert dollars to 2025 only where labeled. |
| Context filesSide files | projected recap balances $1.8 million; unusual-item explanations $22.3 million | Use these side files to decide whether reserve use, projected balances, unusual explanations, shared services, or tax basis should travel with the operating story. | Peer and history checks live in the side-file and reserve sections; they are separate from operating-revenue mix. | Do not read side files as recurring revenue, audited cash, complete payroll, audited savings, or tax-bill advice. |
| Student basisCosts and students | UFB planning on-roll 100; fall enrollment 59 | Use this before making per-student claims: the UFB planning denominator, fall enrollment, and service-load rows can point to different stories. | Denominator and service-load comparisons appear in the costs-and-students section. | Do not replace NJDOE comparative cost with a homemade denominator or treat planning rows as direct proof of student need. |
The bridge is a reporting map, not an accounting equation. It uses the proposed General Fund operating budget as a common scale only where labeled; proposal rows are nominal latest-file movement, and inflation-adjusted trend evidence appears later in 2025 dollars.
Budget pressure map
This table turns the report into a first-read checklist. It ranks the budget pressures that UFB evidence can surface for this district, then separates what each pressure can explain from what still needs reporting outside the UFB files.
| Pressure to test | Evidence in this report | What it can explain | What it cannot prove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relative cost pressurePeer evidence | Operating budget per UFB on-roll student is $445,000, $398,324 above the Passaic County average. | Whether the district looks high, low, or ordinary before a reader turns to categories, taxes, and service load. | Spending quality, efficiency, or the reason the district sits where it does. |
| Operating funding and tax-burden pressureRevenue families | local sources supply 100% of General Fund operating revenue; that source share is 34 pts above the Passaic County average. | Who pays for the operating budget and whether a cost position also creates local levy, aid, or balance-source pressure. | A property-tax bill, audited all-funds revenue, or proof that the funding model is sustainable. |
| Spending mix pressureCategories and lines | general current expense is the largest high-level use at 93% of operating budget; student transportation share is 52%, 45 pts above the Passaic County average; named row Total Tax Levy is -58 pts versus local peers. | Which use categories, cost rows, or named source rows deserve the first follow-up instead of quoting total spending. | A complete program budget or an additive accounting bridge; UFB rows can be nested, repeated, or contextual. |
| Current proposal pressureProposal changes | operating budget changes +$3,913,108 from revised/current to proposed; largest named proposal movement is Local sources at +$4,023,000. | What the latest UFB file says the board is changing now, in nominal revised/current-to-proposed dollars. | The long-run inflation-adjusted trend, or a causal explanation for why the proposal changed. |
| Student and service-load pressureCosts and students | received-from-other-district planning rows equal 100% of UFB on-roll. | Whether a per-student read is really about the denominator, placements, special education, or student-flow rows. | Fall enrollment, program severity, service quality, or audited staffing need. |
| Reserve and side-file pressureSide files | projected close-year recap balances total $1.8 million; positive unusual-item explanations total $22.3 million. | Whether reserve use, projected balances, unusual explanations, or shared-service entries should travel with the operating story. | Recurring revenue, audited cash, complete savings, or a structural-deficit finding without board and audit records. |
| Inflation and denominator pressureTrends and inflation | operating scale changed +$8,186,498 in 2025 dollars from 2019-20 to 2025-26; UFB planning on-roll changed -7. | Whether the background movement is real operating scale, published comparative cost, denominator movement, or a mix. | The current proposal decision, or proof that prices, enrollment, labor, or programs caused the change. |
Pressure rows are generated from the latest UFB summary, source rows, local peer comparisons where enough peers have data, and loaded-year trend rows. Money movement is inflation-adjusted only where this table says 2025 dollars or after inflation; proposal rows are nominal latest-file changes.
Budget tension checks
These checks pair signals that are easy to overread alone: current cost position, inflation-adjusted movement, proposal-column changes, tax burden, funding model, category slices, service load, reserves, and outside-operating rows.
| Tension to test | Signal pair | How it changes the read | Proof |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost position vs real trend | Operating budget per UFB on-roll student is $445,000, $398,324 above the Passaic County average; rank 1 of 21 among Passaic County districts.Operating budget per UFB on-roll student changed +$105,621 after inflation from 2019-20 to 2025-26. | Use the current peer position as the comparison frame and the real-dollar movement as background, not as the same claim. | Peer evidence Trends |
| Current proposal vs loaded-year trend | Operating budget changes +$3,913,108 from revised/current to proposed in the latest UFB file.Operating scale changed +$8,186,498 in 2025 dollars from 2019-20 to 2025-26. | The latest proposal and the real trend point the same way, but proposal-column movement is nominal and current-year while the trend is inflation-adjusted across loaded years. | Proposal Trends |
| Cost position vs spending slice | Operating budget per UFB on-roll student is $445,000, $398,324 above the Passaic County average; rank 1 of 21 among Passaic County districts.Student transportation share is 52%, 45 pts above the Passaic County average; rank 1 of 21 among Passaic County districts. | The category row helps turn the cost comparison into a concrete budget question, but it should not be treated as a complete program audit. | Categories Peer evidence |
| Funding model vs spending slice | Local operating revenue share is 100%, 34 pts above the Passaic County average; rank 1 of 21 among Passaic County districts.Student transportation share is 52%, 45 pts above the Passaic County average; rank 1 of 21 among Passaic County districts. | Pair the revenue model with the use category before implying that a high or low spending slice is locally discretionary. | Categories Anatomy |
Tension checks are generated from the same UFB rows used elsewhere in the report. They are not causal findings. Money trend claims are inflation-adjusted only where labeled as 2025 dollars or after inflation; proposal movement is nominal revised/current-to-proposed movement.
Category story map
Transportation is the largest selected source-row family at 111% of operating-budget scale. Transportation has the widest selected local peer gap, 101 pts above the Passaic County average. Other named rows moved the most after inflation, +$9,105,146 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. This map puts the category question in one place: current scale, local comparison, inflation-adjusted movement, and the latest proposal-column move.
| Budget family | Question to test | Category evidence | Source row and proof |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transportationlarge current scale / local peer gap / inflation-adjusted movement | Is transportation a visible cost or aid signal relative to other districts? | Latest scale $49,415,033 (111% op. equiv.)+101 pts versus the Passaic County average+$5,440,987 real movement from 2019-20 to 2025-26+$900,705 latest proposal movement; +2 pts of operating scale | Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities (Revenue line 250, $26,292,893)Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities (+$1,048,412 latest-file move)Categories Proposal Trend |
| Other named rowslarge current scale / local peer gap / inflation-adjusted movement | Which remaining named rows deserve a closer district-level look? | Latest scale $10,614,828 (24% op. equiv.)+21 pts versus the Passaic County average+$9,105,146 real movement from 2019-20 to 2025-26+$2,146,754 latest proposal movement; +5 pts of operating scale | Total Adult Education-Local (Appropriation line 80340, $2,827,758)Total Community Services Programs/Operations (+$637,481 latest-file move)Categories Proposal Trend |
| Local taxes and local sourceslarge current scale / local peer gap / inflation-adjusted movement | How much of the budget story is local levy, tuition, fees, or miscellaneous local revenue? | Latest scale $11,814,800 (27% op. equiv.)-35 pts versus the Passaic County average+$3,976,123 real movement from 2019-20 to 2025-26+$2,748,264 latest proposal movement; +6 pts of operating scale | Unrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues (Revenue line 300, $11,814,800)Unrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues (+$2,748,264 latest-file move)Categories Proposal Trend |
| Instruction programslarge current scale / local peer gap / inflation-adjusted movement | Which classroom or instructional program rows define the core spending structure? | Latest scale $2,335,389 (5% op. equiv.)-22 pts versus the Passaic County average-$800,101 real movement from 2019-20 to 2025-26-$383,146 latest proposal movement; -1 pt of operating scale | Total Instructional Alternative Ed Program (Appropriation line 21620, $1,812,183)Total Instructional Alternative Ed Program (-$427,518 latest-file move)Categories Proposal Trend |
| State aidlocal peer gap | Which aid lines explain dependence on state funding or first-to-latest movement? | Latest scale $0 (0% op. equiv.)-30 pts versus the Passaic County average$0 real movement from 2019-20 to 2025-26 | No positive latest-year source row.No material proposal row in this family.Categories |
| Employee benefitslarge current scale / local peer gap / inflation-adjusted movement | How large are benefit rows, and are they moving differently from the overall budget? | Latest scale $4,040,842 (9% op. equiv.)-7 pts versus the Passaic County average+$1,949,205 real movement from 2019-20 to 2025-26+$1,426,415 latest proposal movement; +3 pts of operating scale | Total Personal Services-Employee Benefits (Appropriation line 71260, $4,040,842)Total Personal Services-Employee Benefits (+$1,426,415 latest-file move)Categories Proposal Trend |
Budget families are generated from contextual UFB revenue and appropriation source rows. Latest scale and peer gap use proposed operating budget as a common denominator; real movement is converted to 2025 dollars; proposal movement is nominal revised/current-to-proposed movement in the latest UFB file. Families can be nested, outside-operating, or repeated across files, so this is a reporting map rather than an additive budget schedule.
Proposal versus trend
The latest proposal and the loaded-year category trend do not answer the same question. For Plant, operations, and maintenance, the proposal is a counter-move: +$34,346 in nominal latest-file movement versus -$349,604 across loaded years after inflation. Across material family rows, this scan finds 10 continuing trends, 1 counter-move, and 0 current-only moves.
| Relationship | Loaded-year trend | Current proposal | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Counter-movePlant, operations, and maintenance | -$349,6042019-20 to 2025-26 in 2025 dollars; share moved -1 pt. | +$34,3460 pts of proposed operating-budget scale.Total Undistributed Expenditures-Operation and Maintenance of Plant Services (Appropriation, line 51120, +$34,346) | The latest proposal points opposite the loaded-year real movement, so this is the first place to check whether the budget is pivoting.Proposal Trend Categories Peers |
| Continues trendTransportation | +$5,440,9872019-20 to 2025-26 in 2025 dollars; share moved -10 pts. | +$900,705+2 pts of proposed operating-budget scale.Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities (Revenue, line 250, +$1,048,412) | The latest proposal points in the same direction as the inflation-adjusted movement across loaded UFB years.Proposal Trend Categories Peers |
| Continues trendGeneral current expense | +$5,046,7402019-20 to 2025-26 in 2025 dollars; share moved -7 pts. | +$3,193,029+7 pts of proposed operating-budget scale.Total General Current Expense (Appropriation, line 72260, +$3,193,029) | The latest proposal points in the same direction as the inflation-adjusted movement across loaded UFB years.Proposal Trend Categories Peers |
| Continues trendOther named rows | +$9,105,1462019-20 to 2025-26 in 2025 dollars; share moved +20 pts. | +$2,146,754+5 pts of proposed operating-budget scale.Total Community Services Programs/Operations (Appropriation, line 27100, +$637,481) | The latest proposal points in the same direction as the inflation-adjusted movement across loaded UFB years.Proposal Trend Categories Peers |
| Continues trendLocal taxes and local sources | +$3,976,1232019-20 to 2025-26 in 2025 dollars; share moved +5 pts. | +$2,748,264+6 pts of proposed operating-budget scale.Unrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues (Revenue, line 300, +$2,748,264) | The latest proposal points in the same direction as the inflation-adjusted movement across loaded UFB years.Proposal Trend Categories Peers |
| Continues trendInstruction programs | -$800,1012019-20 to 2025-26 in 2025 dollars; share moved -3 pts. | -$383,146-1 pt of proposed operating-budget scale.Total Instructional Alternative Ed Program (Appropriation, line 21620, -$427,518) | The latest proposal points in the same direction as the inflation-adjusted movement across loaded UFB years.Proposal Trend Categories Peers |
This bridge keeps timing bases separate. Loaded-year trend values are inflation-adjusted to 2025 dollars and compare the first and latest loaded UFB years; proposal values are nominal revised/current-to-proposed movement in the latest UFB file. A counter-move is a reporting prompt, not proof of a policy reversal or cause.
Budget reporting lead sheet
This lead sheet turns the generated budget signals into a reporting agenda: what looks most explainable, what question a resident should ask, and which caveat keeps the evidence from becoming an overclaim.
Lead order comes from local peer gaps, UFB row scale, planning-enrollment rows, and inflation-adjusted movement. It ranks reportability, not importance to students or proof that a district should spend differently.
Editorial frame
For Northern Region Educational Services Commission, the useful budget question is how to read local sources supply 100% of operating revenue, largest use is general current expense at 93%, and real operating scale changed +$8,186,498 since 2019-20. UFB can establish the money basis, peer position, row scale, and loaded-year movement; it cannot by itself prove whether the pattern reflects policy choices, student need, contracts, facilities, tax capacity, or one-time accounting.
This frame is generated from the same UFB signals as the lead sheet. It is designed to prevent the report from turning row evidence into unsupported causality.
Budget model synthesis
Read this budget as mostly locally funded, general-current centered, and real operating growth. The table below connects the strongest structural signals so the report is not just a list of panels.
| Structural question | UFB evidence | Working read and proof section |
|---|---|---|
| Is this mainly a cost position or a scale story? | operating budget per UFB on-roll is $445,000, $398,324 above the Passaic County average | Can explainTreat cost rank as a starting signal, then test it against funding model, student/service load, denominator choices, and outside-operating rows before calling it efficiency, waste, or adequacy.Cannot proveA high or low rank does not prove value, waste, staffing quality, student need, or tax fairness by itself.Check: Peer evidence |
| Who pays, and is the tax-burden basis unusual? | local sources supply 100% of operating revenue, 34 pts above the Passaic County average | Can explainThe same per-pupil cost can mean different things in a locally funded, state-funded, or balance-supported budget. Operating revenue is not all-funds revenue, and UFB tax rows are context rather than a household tax bill.Cannot proveFunding share is not a full taxpayer-burden claim, and balance/reserve sources should not be read as recurring aid.Check: Operating funding and tax-burden basis |
| What does the operating budget buy differently? | largest high-level use is general current expense, 93% of operating budget; strongest peer mix gap is student transportation share at 52%, 45 pts above the Passaic County average; named-row standout: Total Tax Levy is -58 pts versus peers | Can explainUse shares and named rows are reporting leads. They can reflect pass-throughs, accounting structure, program obligations, staffing, contracts, facilities, or policy choices, so the category label is not the cause.Cannot proveUFB rows can be nested, repeated, or outside the operating fund, so category differences are not an additive causal bridge.Check: Categories and lines |
| Does the student/service load change the cost reading? | free/reduced-price lunch is 100%, +42 pts versus county fall-enrollment context | Can explainPer-student comparisons move when the denominator, sent/received flows, special-education planning rows, or student-need context differ. These rows are context, not a quality or compliance finding by themselves.Cannot provePlanning-enrollment and placement rows do not replace fall enrollment, individual service plans, or audited program costs.Check: Costs and students |
| What is the live decision versus the real long-run movement? | latest proposal changes operating budget +$3,913,108; real operating scale changed +$8,186,498 from 2019-20 to 2025-26; UFB on-roll changed -7; operating per UFB on-roll changed +$105,621 after inflation | Can explainCurrent proposal changes are nominal latest-file decisions. Trend claims convert loaded years to real dollars, and per-student movement must separate the budget numerator from the UFB planning-enrollment denominator.Cannot proveA real-dollar movement does not identify the board decision, contract, aid formula, or accounting change that produced it.Check: Proposal and inflation trend |
| Which context rows may explain the budget year without being recurring operating spending? | projected close-year recap balances total $1.8 million; unusual-item file has 27 positive rows; largest is Various NJ school districts at $5.8 million; selected administrative base-salary rows total $1.5 million | Can explainReserve, balance, unusual-item, shared-service, school-resource, tax-rate, and salary rows can explain a budget year, but they are mixed side files and should not be summed into operating spending.Cannot proveSide-file amounts are not audited recurring operating totals and may be explanations, balances, estimates, or staffing snapshots.Check: Side files |
This is a generated synthesis of published UFB rows, local peer context, and loaded-year movement. It is a reporting frame, not a causal finding or a claim that unlike denominators can be added together.
Cost gap ledger
This ledger translates the cost comparison into the largest visible gaps against the Passaic County average. Dollar rows are shown per UFB planning student where the source row is not already a per-pupil measure, so a reader can see whether the story is broad operating scale, who pays, a use category, a pupil-cost row, or a service-load denominator.
| Budget basis | This district | Gap vs average | How to read it | Proof |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost basisOperating budget per UFB on-roll | $445,000Passaic County average: $46,676 | +$398,324Rank 1 of 21 | A scale check using the UFB planning denominator. It can confirm or complicate the published comparative-cost position. | Cost basis |
| Source per UFB on-rollLocal sources | $445,000Passaic County average: $37,489 | +$407,511Rank 1 of 21 | Funding rows show who pays for the budget. They explain pressure on the model, not what the district buys. | Revenue families |
| Use per UFB on-rollStudent transportation | $231,221Passaic County average: $12,380 | +$218,842Rank 1 of 21 | Use rows show where dollars sit per planning student. They are clues, not an additive bridge, because UFB rows can be nested or outside operating funds. | Labor context |
| Use per UFB on-rollGeneral current expense | $413,602Passaic County average: $42,542 | +$371,060Rank 1 of 21 | Use rows show where dollars sit per planning student. They are clues, not an additive bridge, because UFB rows can be nested or outside operating funds. | Categories |
| Use per UFB on-rollEmployee benefits | $40,408Passaic County average: $6,087 | +$34,322Rank 1 of 21 | Use rows show where dollars sit per planning student. They are clues, not an additive bridge, because UFB rows can be nested or outside operating funds. | Labor context |
| Use per UFB on-rollCapital outlay | $3,120Passaic County average: $1,172 | +$1,948Rank 3 of 21 | Use rows show where dollars sit per planning student. They are clues, not an additive bridge, because UFB rows can be nested or outside operating funds. | Budget anatomy |
| Source per UFB on-rollFund balance / other operating sources | $0Passaic County average: $2,119 | -$2,119Rank 20 of 21 | Funding rows show who pays for the budget. They explain pressure on the model, not what the district buys. | Revenue families |
| Use per UFB on-rollSpecial Revenue Funds | $0Passaic County average: $1,391 | -$1,391Rank 21 of 21 | Use rows show where dollars sit per planning student. They are clues, not an additive bridge, because UFB rows can be nested or outside operating funds. | Budget anatomy |
| Source per UFB on-rollBudgeted fund balance | $0Passaic County average: $1,328 | -$1,328Rank 20 of 21 | Funding rows show who pays for the budget. They explain pressure on the model, not what the district buys. | Revenue families |
| Use per UFB on-rollSchool-based budgeting contribution | $0Passaic County average: $1,058 | -$1,058Rank 3 of 21 | Use rows show where dollars sit per planning student. They are clues, not an additive bridge, because UFB rows can be nested or outside operating funds. | Categories |
Rows use the Passaic County average with usable latest-year UFB data. The ledger is not an additive decomposition: revenue rows, lower-level appropriation rows, outside-operating rows, and pupil-cost rows answer different questions and must be checked in their proof sections.
UFB source coverage
The latest matched UFB row for 2025-26 exposes 7 usable source families for this report. This inventory shows what each file can establish before the report turns those rows into peer comparisons, trend checks, and source tables.
| Source family | Latest coverage | What it can establish | Where it appears |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summary | $44.5 million proposed operating budget; 7 loaded UFB years: 2019-20 to 2025-26. | Published comparative cost, operating budget, summary revenue shares, tax levy, and UFB on-roll planning enrollment. | peer evidence · anatomySummary rows are the profile-facing spine, but they do not replace detailed source files. |
| Revenue file | 8 positive rows; 5 contextual rows in the appendix; largest: Total Revenues from Local Sources at $44.5 million. | Named aid, levy, fund-balance, reserve, tuition, grant, and other source rows behind the operating mix. | families · source rowsRevenue rows can include subtotals or non-operating sources; do not add the contextual rows into one revenue total. |
| Appropriation file | 32 positive rows; 29 contextual rows in the appendix; largest: Total General Current Expense at $41.4 million. | High-level operating uses, fund totals, transfers, lower-level cost rows, capital, debt, and special-revenue scale. | categories · source rowsMany appropriation rows are nested; operating-equivalent shares are a scale reference, not an additive bridge. |
| Pupil-cost file | 0 published per-pupil rows with latest proposed-year values. | NJDOE standardized per-pupil cost categories such as classroom, support, operations, administration, and benefits. | costs and studentsThese are NJDOE-published cost rows; the report does not recompute them from appropriations or enrollment. |
| Budget-enrollment file | 2 planning rows; on-roll 100, received 100. | UFB planning enrollment, special-education on-roll, sent/received placement rows, contract preschool, and denominator context. | students and service loadThese are planning rows, not fall enrollment, and counts should not be added to dollar rows. |
| Recap / balances | 14 balance rows; Unrestricted-General Operating Budget at $1.7 million. | Projected close-year balances, reserves, restricted balances, and fund-balance context. | side filesRecap balances are not current operating appropriations or spendable-cash claims. |
| Estimated tax file | 0 municipal/regional slices. | Estimated school-tax rates, levy slices, equalized values, taxable values, and regional spread context. | tax effort · raw tax rowsTax-file rows are estimated UFB context, not tax-bill advice or audited property-tax data. |
| Unusual-item file | 27 positive explanation rows; $22.3 million total flagged amount. | District-reported unusual revenue or appropriation explanations that may change the current-year story. | side-file explanationsUnusual rows can duplicate named revenue or appropriation rows and should not be added as a separate spending total. |
| Shared-services file | 0 arrangement rows. | District-reported shared-service arrangements and optional savings fields. | shared-service profileReported savings are context rows, not audited offsets against the operating budget. |
| School-resource file | 0 resource rows. | Published school-based resource statement rows where the district provides the side file. | school-resource rowsThese rows appear only for districts that publish the statement and can overlap with other operating rows. |
| Admin-salary file | 13 listed salary rows; listed base salary total $1.5 million. | Selected administrative salary rows, FTE, shared-service flags, contract fields, and comments where published. | listed admin salariesThis is selected listed administration, not complete payroll or total compensation. |
Presence in this inventory means the matched NJDOE User-Friendly Budget file includes usable rows for the latest budget year. Missing side-file rows may mean not published, not applicable, or no positive material entry; file coverage is evidence routing, not a fiscal total.
Statewide budget model
This district matches 1 generated statewide comparison frame. Those frames point to the fairest next comparison before reading every UFB source row.
Model thresholds mirror the statewide budget explorer where possible: funding shares, transfer pressure, school-based budgeting, small UFB on-roll, placement load, outside-operating scale, high tax effort, and real-dollar movement. Frames can overlap.
Statewide slice comparisons
These latest-year slices compare the district with statewide groups that share its funding model, UFB on-roll scale, cost position, or category signals. UFB on-roll here is 100.
| Comparison frame | Measure | District | Comparison avg | Gap | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All NJ UFB districtsThis is the statewide baseline before narrowing to a more comparable slice. | Operating budget per UFB on-roll student | $445,000 | $39,253 | +$405,747 | 3 of 578 |
| Mostly locally funded districtsFunding model changes what a cost comparison means, because local levy, state aid, and other sources carry different reader questions. | Operating budget per UFB on-roll student | $445,000 | $45,725 | +$399,275 | 3 of 379 |
| Under-500 UFB on-roll districtsUFB on-roll scale helps separate fixed-cost pressure from large-system operating scale. | Operating budget per UFB on-roll student | $445,000 | $74,736 | +$370,264 | 3 of 151 |
Read down the ladder before treating one rank as the story: local peers, all NJ, and overlapping statewide slices can point in different directions.
Slices are comparison frames, not causal peer cohorts. Districts can appear in several slices, and dollar figures in this panel are latest-year UFB dollars unless another section says it converts to real dollars.
Named similar-budget-model comps
The closest statewide comparison question is not only local geography. This screen names districts whose latest UFB profile is nearest on mostly locally funded, under 500 UFB on-roll, general current expense centered, then keeps cost, funding, use, service, and tax clues in the same row.
| Named comp | Why similar | Cost basis | Funding and use | Service/tax clue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camden Co Ed Serv CommCamden County | mostly locally funded, general current expense centered | cost rows limited | mostly locally funded; general current expense centered (local 100%) | service-load rows limited |
| Washington TwpBurlington County | mostly locally funded, general current expense centered | cost rows limited | mostly locally funded; general current expense centered (local 83%, state 10%) | service-load rows limited |
| Sea Isle CityCape May County | mostly locally funded, general current expense centered | cost rows limited | mostly locally funded; general current expense centered (local 82%, state 5%) | service-load rows limited |
| Monmouth Beach BoroMonmouth County · 237 UFB on-roll | mostly locally funded, under 500 UFB on-roll, general current expense centered | comparative $26,781; operating/UFB on-roll $27,373 | mostly locally funded; general current expense centered (local 94%, state 4%) | sent placements <1% of UFB on-roll; special-ed planning 10% |
| Washington TwpWarren County · 468 UFB on-roll | mostly locally funded, under 500 UFB on-roll, general current expense centered | comparative $18,690; operating/UFB on-roll $18,967 | mostly locally funded; general current expense centered (local 90%, state 9%) | special-ed planning 14%; tax levy/UFB on-roll $16,829 |
| Essex Fells BoroEssex County · 248 UFB on-roll | mostly locally funded, under 500 UFB on-roll, general current expense centered | comparative $25,538; operating/UFB on-roll $27,457 | mostly locally funded; general current expense centered (local 91%, state 6%) | sent placements 1% of UFB on-roll; special-ed planning 10% |
These are algorithmic nearest neighbors across published latest-year UFB measures, not causal peers, targets, or quality ratings. The screen is meant to make statewide slice comparisons concrete before the report moves into local peer ranks and raw source rows.
What changed, and what drove it
This panel turns the first-to-latest UFB history into reporting leads: inflation-adjusted operating scale, denominator movement, peer-position change, source shifts, use shifts, and named rows.
This is not an additive budget bridge. UFB rows are contextual and sometimes nested, and loaded UFB year columns mix actual-cost, revised/original-budget, and proposed-budget bases.
Budget report section
What should a resident ask before reading the row-level tables?
Budget walkthrough
Read the budget in five passes: money in, money out, costs and students, what changed, and which UFB side files deserve attention.
Local sources supplied 100% of the proposed operating budget, 34 pts above the Passaic County average.
The largest high-level use is general current expense, $41.4 million or 93% of the operating budget.
This walkthrough uses the same generated measures as the tables below. It is an orientation layer, not a substitute for the UFB source rows.
Budget diagnostic
These generated checks turn the UFB source files into reader questions: cost position, funding model, spending mix, student-service load, inflation-adjusted movement, and side-file context.
The diagnostics compare measures only where enough local peers have usable UFB values. Ranks and gaps are flags for reporting, not judgments about whether the spending is good or bad.
Budget report section
What changed from revised/current to proposed, and which named rows explain the movement?
Current proposal changes
This section compares the latest UFB revised/current-budget column with the proposed-budget column. It answers what the proposal changes now, before the report turns to long-run inflation-adjusted trends.
| UFB row | Revised/current | Proposed | Change | Op. equiv. | Peer avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local sourcesUFB line 370 | $40,477,000 | $44,500,000 | +$4,023,000 | 9% | 3% |
| Operating budgetUFB line 720 | $40,586,892 | $44,500,000 | +$3,913,108 | 9% | 2% |
| Unrestricted miscellaneous revenueUFB line 300 | $9,066,536 | $11,814,800 | +$2,748,264 | 6% | <1% |
| Tuition revenueUFB line 190 | $6,165,983 | $6,368,307 | +$202,324 | <1% | >-1% |
| UFB row | Revised/current | Proposed | Change | Op. equiv. | Peer avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General current expenseUFB line 72260 | $38,167,213 | $41,360,242 | +$3,193,029 | 7% | 3% |
| Employee benefitsUFB line 71260 | $2,614,427 | $4,040,842 | +$1,426,415 | 3% | 2% |
| Special schoolsUFB line 83080 | $2,377,179 | $2,827,758 | +$450,579 | 1% | n/a |
| Capital outlayUFB line 76400 | $42,500 | $312,000 | +$269,500 | <1% | >-1% |
| Student transportationUFB line 52480 | $23,269,847 | $23,122,140 | -$147,707 | >-1% | <1% |
| Regular programs instructionUFB line 3200 | $60,000 | $10,000 | -$50,000 | >-1% | <1% |
| Special education instructionUFB line 10300 | $703,605 | $748,233 | +$44,628 | <1% | <1% |
| UFB row | Revised/current | Proposed | Change | Peer avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On-roll, full | 59 | 100 | +41 | 6% |
| Received from other districts | 59 | 100 | +41 | 296% |
Dollar rows are nominal latest-file dollars, not inflation-adjusted trend dollars. "Op. equiv." is the row change as a share of this district’s proposed operating budget; the peer average uses Passaic County districts with usable rows, so it is a scale comparison rather than an additive accounting bridge. Pupil-cost rows use NJDOE-published per-pupil lines, and enrollment rows are UFB planning enrollment, not fall enrollment.
Proposal package
The material named-row proposal scan has a net increase of +$19,067,132. The largest family in the package is Other named rows, with $9,424,584 of increases and $259,892 of reductions. Reductions in the same scan total $835,117 against $19,902,249 of increases.
| Budget family | Increases | Reductions | Net scan | Peer net | Largest rows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other named rows10 material named rows | $9,424,58421% of op. scale | $259,892<1% of op. scale | +$9,164,692+21 pts of op. scale | +2 ptsPassaic County average | Total Revenues from Local Sources (Revenue, line 370, +$4,023,000)Total Before/After School Programs (Appropriation, line 19620, -$150,000) |
| General current expense1 material named row | $3,193,0297% of op. scale | $00% of op. scale | +$3,193,029+7 pts of op. scale | +3 ptsPassaic County average | Total General Current Expense (Appropriation, line 72260, +$3,193,029)No material reduction in this family. |
| Local taxes and local sources1 material named row | $2,748,2646% of op. scale | $00% of op. scale | +$2,748,264+6 pts of op. scale | +3 ptsPassaic County average | Unrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues (Revenue, line 300, +$2,748,264)No material reduction in this family. |
| Employee benefits1 material named row | $1,426,4153% of op. scale | $00% of op. scale | +$1,426,415+3 pts of op. scale | +2 ptsPassaic County average | Total Personal Services-Employee Benefits (Appropriation, line 71260, +$1,426,415)No material reduction in this family. |
| Transportation2 material named rows | $1,048,4122% of op. scale | $147,707<1% of op. scale | +$900,705+2 pts of op. scale | 0 ptsPassaic County average | Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities (Revenue, line 250, +$1,048,412)Total Undistributed Expenditures-Student Transportation Services (Appropriation, line 52480, -$147,707) |
| Administration and central services3 material named rows | $808,7662% of op. scale | $00% of op. scale | +$808,766+2 pts of op. scale | 0 ptsPassaic County average | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Administrative Informationtechnology (Appropriation, line 47620, +$517,659)No material reduction in this family. |
| Special education and student supports2 material named rows | $711,1552% of op. scale | $00% of op. scale | +$711,155+2 pts of op. scale | 0 ptsPassaic County average | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Speech, OT, PT and Related Services (Appropriation, line 40580, +$629,563)No material reduction in this family. |
| Instruction programs2 material named rows | $69,800<1% of op. scale | $427,518<1% of op. scale | -$357,718-1 pt of op. scale | +1 ptPassaic County average | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Improvement of Instruction Services (Appropriation, line 43200, +$69,800)Total Instructional Alternative Ed Program (Appropriation, line 21620, -$427,518) |
This panel groups material named UFB proposal-row movement between the revised/current and proposed columns. Dollar changes are nominal latest-file dollars. Increases, reductions, and net scan values are a reporting summary of contextual source rows, not a balanced accounting bridge, because UFB rows can be nested, repeated, subtotals, or outside the operating fund. Peer net is the average same-family net movement as a share of proposed operating budget among Passaic County districts with usable rows.
Named-line proposal drivers
This table scans the latest UFB revenue and appropriation files for named rows that changed between the revised/current-budget and proposed-budget columns. It gives the proposal story row names after the standardized summary rows above.
The largest named increase in this all-line scan is Total Revenues from Local Sources, up $4,023,000 in the revenue file. The largest named reduction is Total Instructional Alternative Ed Program, down $427,518 in the appropriation file.
| UFB row | Revised/current | Proposed | Change | Op. equiv. | Peer avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Revenues from Local SourcesRevenue | Subtotal | UFB line 370 | Acct. ' | $40,477,000 | $44,500,000 | +$4,023,000 | 9% | 3%n=21 |
| Total General Current ExpenseUse | Subtotal | UFB line 72260 | Acct. ' | $38,167,213 | $41,360,242 | +$3,193,029 | 7% | 3%n=21 |
| Total Undistributed ExpendituresUse | Subtotal | UFB line 72140 | Acct. ' | $33,591,628 | $36,620,566 | +$3,028,938 | 7% | 2%n=21 |
| Unrestricted Miscellaneous RevenuesRevenue | Account row | UFB line 300 | Acct. '10-1XXX | $9,066,536 | $11,814,800 | +$2,748,264 | 6% | <1%n=16 |
| Total Personal Services-Employee BenefitsUse | Subtotal | UFB line 71260 | Acct. '11-XXX-XXX-2X | $2,614,427 | $4,040,842 | +$1,426,415 | 3% | 2%n=21 |
| Transportation Fees from Other Local Education AuthoritiesRevenue | Account row | UFB line 250 | Acct. '10-1420-1440 | $25,244,481 | $26,292,893 | +$1,048,412 | 2% | n/a |
| Total Community Services Programs/OperationsUse | Subtotal | UFB line 27100 | Acct. '11-800-330-XX | $513,279 | $1,150,760 | +$637,481 | 1% | n/a |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures-Speech, OT, PT and Related ServicesUse | Subtotal | UFB line 40580 | Acct. '11-000-216-XX | $4,245,612 | $4,875,175 | +$629,563 | 1% | >-1%n=19 |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures-Administrative InformationtechnologyUse | Subtotal | UFB line 47620 | Acct. '11-000-252-XX | $964,151 | $1,481,810 | +$517,659 | 1% | <1%n=20 |
| Total Adult Education-LocalUse | Subtotal | UFB line 80340 | Acct. '13-602-X00-XX | $2,377,179 | $2,827,758 | +$450,579 | 1% | n/a |
| Total Special SchoolsUse | Subtotal | UFB line 83080 | Acct. '13-XXX-XXX-XX | $2,377,179 | $2,827,758 | +$450,579 | 1% | n/a |
| Total Instructional Alternative Ed ProgramUse | Subtotal | UFB line 21620 | Acct. '11-423-XXX-XX | $2,239,701 | $1,812,183 | -$427,518 | >-1% | n/a |
| Total Adult Education-Local-Support ServicesUse | Subtotal | UFB line 80320 | Acct. '13-602-200-XX | $2,019,045 | $2,444,052 | +$425,007 | <1% | n/a |
| Total EquipmentUse | Subtotal | UFB line 75880 | Acct. '12-XXX-XXX-73 | $12,500 | $312,000 | +$299,500 | <1% | >-1%n=18 |
Dollar changes are nominal latest-file dollars. "Op. equiv." is the row change as a share of this district's proposed operating budget. The peer average is the same source row among Passaic County districts with usable changed rows, not a target. Subtotal rows and detail rows can overlap, rows can move because a grant or fund section is being closed out, and these rows are evidence for reporting questions rather than an additive accounting bridge.
Budget report section
Where does this district sit among local peers, named neighbors, and peer trends?
Local peer evidence
Each strip shows one generated budget measure across Passaic County districts. Gray dots are peer districts, the accent dot is this district, and the dashed mark is the Passaic County average. Each row uses its own scale so the reader can see the local distribution behind the rank and gap; higher values are not automatically better or worse.
Named peer context
These markers name the Passaic County districts around this district, so a rank or average can be checked against specific local districts rather than anonymous dots alone.
$445,000Rank 1 of 21; +$398,324 vs Passaic County average.
$15,018Rank 1 of 21; +$13,528 vs Passaic County average.
52%Rank 1 of 21; +45 pts vs Passaic County average.
100%Rank 1 of 21; +34 pts vs Passaic County average.
<1%Rank 21 of 21; -8 pts vs Passaic County average.
Each measure keeps its own unit and denominator. "Next higher" and "next lower" mean numerically higher or lower on that measure, not better or worse; links open the named district budget report when available.
Local comparison roster
This roster names 21 rows in the local peer set behind averages and ranks for Passaic County districts. 20 have a usable NJDOE comparative-cost value; this district does not have a usable NJDOE comparative-cost value in the latest row, so it is listed without a cost rank.
| District | Comparative cost | Cost rank | UFB on-roll | Operating budget | Funding model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ringwood BoroPeer district | $26,590 | 1 of 20 | 991 | $29.2 million | Mostly locally funded85% local / 8% state |
| Passaic Valley RegionalPeer district | $26,346 | 2 of 20 | 1,092 | $38.7 million | Mostly locally funded82% local / 7% state |
| Passaic County VocationalPeer district | $26,192 | 3 of 20 | 4,707 | $144.1 million | Mixed-source39% local / 48% state |
| Passaic CityPeer district | $24,842 | 4 of 20 | 12,804 | $320.3 million | Mostly state-funded6% local / 86% state |
| Paterson CityPeer district | $24,142 | 5 of 20 | 29,553 | $750.4 million | Mostly state-funded12% local / 83% state |
| Lakeland RegionalPeer district | $23,780 | 6 of 20 | 829 | $26.3 million | Mostly locally funded86% local / 8% state |
| Passaic Co Manchester RegPeer district | $23,523 | 7 of 20 | 822 | $33.6 million | Mixed-source37% local / 51% state |
| Totowa BoroPeer district | $23,495 | 8 of 20 | 970 | $27.1 million | Mostly locally funded68% local / 4% state |
| West Milford TwpPeer district | $23,445 | 9 of 20 | 2,921 | $81.4 million | Mostly locally funded88% local / 8% state |
| Wayne TwpPeer district | $22,751 | 10 of 20 | 7,639 | $194.5 million | Mostly locally funded91% local / 9% state |
| Bloomingdale BoroPeer district | $22,439 | 11 of 20 | 719 | $24.3 million | Mostly locally funded81% local / 9% state |
| Pompton Lakes BoroPeer district | $21,590 | 12 of 20 | 1,680 | $43.4 million | Mostly locally funded68% local / 22% state |
| Haledon BoroPeer district | $21,516 | 13 of 20 | 1,013 | $25.2 million | Mixed-source28% local / 55% state |
| Clifton CityPeer district | $21,147 | 14 of 20 | 11,673 | $270.8 million | Mixed-source57% local / 40% state |
| Hawthorne BoroPeer district | $20,701 | 15 of 20 | 2,170 | $54.2 million | Mostly locally funded85% local / 8% state |
| Wanaque BoroPeer district | $20,454 | 16 of 20 | 927 | $20.7 million | Mostly locally funded87% local / 9% state |
| North Haledon BoroPeer district | $19,912 | 17 of 20 | 622 | $13.0 million | Mostly locally funded89% local / 7% state |
| Woodland ParkPeer district | $19,902 | 18 of 20 | 1,244 | $23.3 million | Mostly locally funded84% local / 15% state |
| Little Falls TwpPeer district | $19,692 | 19 of 20 | 982 | $20.5 million | Mostly locally funded87% local / 7% state |
| Prospect Park BoroPeer district | $18,362 | 20 of 20 | 898 | $17.8 million | Mostly state-funded20% local / 78% state |
| Northern Region Educational Services CommissionThis district | n/a | n/a | 100 | $44.5 million | Mostly locally funded100% local / n/a state |
This is the local comparison universe used elsewhere in this report when the Passaic County average is available. Comparative cost is NJDOE's published per-pupil line, not operating budget divided by enrollment. UFB on-roll is the planning-enrollment denominator, and operating budget is proposed General Fund operating scale; the funding-model column uses proposed General Fund operating revenue shares, not all-funds revenue.
Current operating mix versus peers
These stacked bars put the latest operating-budget composition beside the Passaic County average before the report moves into row-level trends. They answer a narrower question than the cost trend: whether this district funds or uses its operating budget differently from local peers.
Local sources: 100% here versus 66% for the county avg, a +34 pts gap.
General Fund operating revenue sources, not all-funds revenue or tax bills. Peer bar is the unweighted average among 21 local peer rows with usable latest-year mix data.
Special schools: 6% here versus <1% for the county avg, a +6 pts gap.
High-level General Fund appropriation rows; lower-level rows can be nested. Peer bar is the unweighted average among 21 local peer rows with usable latest-year mix data.
All shares use the latest proposed General Fund operating budget as the denominator. The comparison is a local peer benchmark, not a target, adequacy finding, accounting bridge, or proof that any category is discretionary.
Position over time
| Measure | First peer gap | Latest peer gap | Gap movement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating budget per UFB on-roll student | 2019-20: +$297,626 | 2025-26: +$398,324 | +$100,698 |
| Student transportation share | 2019-20: +53 pts | 2025-26: +45 pts | -8 pts |
| Local operating revenue share | 2019-20: +30 pts | 2025-26: +34 pts | +4 pts |
| Operations and maintenance share | 2019-20: -6 pts | 2025-26: -8 pts | -2 pts |
| Fund balance / other operating revenue share | 2019-20: -5 pts | 2025-26: -7 pts | -2 pts |
Each row tracks this district against the Passaic County average for a selected UFB measure. Money measures are converted to 2025 dollars; percentage measures keep their stated UFB denominators. Rows use independent zoomed axes, so compare the labeled gaps and the table rather than comparing vertical distance across different measures.
Current operating revenue mix
This bar shows proposed General Fund operating revenue sources for the latest UFB year. It is not an all-funds revenue mix.
Budget report section
After inflation, what changed in scale, per-student cost, funding mix, and named lines?
Budget turning points
The largest surfaced annual turn is the source-family turn in 2019-20 to 2020-21. This table looks at consecutive loaded UFB years, so the question is when a budget signal changed after inflation, versus peers, or against its denominator; ordinary nominal growth stays background.
| Turn | Signal | How to read it | Check next |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real per-student cost turn2023-24 to 2024-25 | +$326,934Operating budget per UFB on-roll student moved +$326,934 in 2025 dollars. UFB planning on-roll moved -136 students in the same window. | This names the annual period where real operating scale per planning student moved most; it does not prove service quality, efficiency, or program cause. | Trend evidence |
| Payer-mix turn2022-23 to 2023-24 | +4 ptsLocal operating revenue share moved +4 pts of proposed operating-budget share. | This is a General Fund operating-revenue mix signal, not an all-funds revenue statement or a household tax-bill calculation. | Category evidence |
| Source-family turn2019-20 to 2020-21 | +$4,226,509Other named rows moved +$4,226,509 after inflation (+10 pts of operating scale). Largest latest row: Total Adult Education-Local. | This groups selected UFB revenue and appropriation rows into a reporting family. Rows can be nested, so use it as a route to proof, not an additive accounting bridge. | Category evidence |
| Named-row turn2022-23 to 2023-24 | +$2,605,402Unrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues moved +$2,605,402 after inflation (+5 pts of operating scale); Revenue line 300. | This is the strongest annual source-row movement, but UFB rows are selected and often nested. Check the source row before turning it into a cause. | Source rows |
| Student/service-load turn2022-23 to 2023-24 | +100 ptsReceived-from-other-district share moved +100 pts of UFB planning on-roll; latest share 100%. | This is a denominator and service-load signal. It can change the per-student read, but it is not by itself proof of service expansion, contraction, or need. | Cost/student evidence |
Annual turns compare adjacent loaded User-Friendly Budget years. Money movements are converted to 2025 dollars with BLS CPI-U annual averages; peer gaps use the same local peer trend basis as the position-over-time panel. Mixed units are intentionally kept in a table so source families, named rows, peer gaps, payer mix, and student-load signals are not read as one additive scale.
Per-student cost change anatomy
The main arithmetic driver was the budget numerator: latest real operating dollars add $76,509 per UFB on-roll student before denominator movement is applied.
Local peer gap. Operating per UFB on-roll was +$398,324 versus the Passaic County average in 2025-26; the gap moved +$100,698 since 2019-20.
| Step | Per-student value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point, 2019-20 | $339,379 | Real operating budget divided by first-year UFB on-roll. |
| Budget numerator effect | +$76,509 | Move to 2025-26 real operating dollars while holding 2019-20 UFB on-roll constant. |
| Enrollment denominator effect | +$29,112 | Then move from 107 to 100 UFB on-roll students. |
| Ending point, 2025-26 | $445,000 | The district’s latest real operating budget per UFB on-roll student. |
| Measure | 2019-20 | 2025-26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating budget | $36,313,502 | $44,500,000 | +$8,186,498 23% |
| UFB on-roll planning enrollment | 107 | 100 | -7 -7% |
| Operating per UFB on-roll | $339,379 | $445,000 | +$105,621 |
| Passaic County average op. per UFB on-roll | $41,753 | $46,676 | +$4,923 |
The numerator effect is a net scale check. These are the largest inflation-adjusted named UFB row movements to inspect against it; rows can be contextual or nested.
| UFB row | 2019-20 | 2025-26 | Real change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transportation Fees from Other Local Education AuthoritiesRevenue | $22,236,757 | $26,292,893 | +$4,056,136 |
| Unrestricted Miscellaneous RevenuesRevenue | $7,838,677 | $11,814,800 | +$3,976,123 |
| Total Adult Education-LocalAppropriation | $0 | $2,827,758 | +$2,827,758 |
| Total Special SchoolsAppropriation | $0 | $2,827,758 | +$2,827,758 |
This is arithmetic decomposition, not causal modeling. It uses proposed operating budget converted to 2025 dollars and UFB on-roll planning enrollment. Operating budget per UFB on-roll is a scale check; it does not replace NJDOE’s published comparative-cost line, and UFB planning enrollment can differ from fall enrollment.
Operating funding shift
Operating-source movement is mixed. Local sources moved from 100% to 100% of proposed operating funding, 0 pts from 2019-20 to 2025-26. In the latest file, the biggest local peer gap was local sources, +34 pts versus the Passaic County average.
| Operating source | 2019-20 share | 2025-26 share | Share move | Real source move | Passaic County average | Latest peer gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal sources | 0% | 0% | 0 pts | $0 | 2% | -2 pts |
| Fund balance / other | 0% | 0% | 0 pts | $0 | 2% | -2 pts |
| Local sources | 100% | 100% | 0 pts | +$8,186,498 | 66% | +34 pts |
| State sources | 0% | 0% | 0 pts | $0 | 27% | -27 pts |
Operating revenue here means General Fund operating revenue in the UFB summary, not all-funds revenue. Shares use each UFB year's proposed operating budget as the denominator; real-dollar movement converts source dollars to 2025 dollars with CPI-U. The fund balance / other bucket is a funding-model signal, while named fund-balance, reserve, and carryover source rows are separated in the source-history panel below.
Loaded-year budget ledger
From 2019-20 to 2025-26, operating budget +$8,186,498; operating per on-roll +$105,621 in 2025 dollars.
| Year | Operating budget | UFB on-roll | Op./on-roll | Peer op./on-roll | Comparative cost | Peer comp. cost | Funding mix | Largest use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | $36,313,502 | 107 | $339,379 | $41,753 | n/a | $22,446 | local 100% | General current expense 100% |
| 2020-21 | $40,753,766 | 125 | $326,030 | $41,356 | n/a | $22,742 | local 100% | General current expense 96% |
| 2021-22 | $40,142,642 | 104 | $385,987 | $44,025 | n/a | $22,465 | local 99% | General current expense 95% |
| 2022-23 | $40,426,670 | 123 | $328,672 | $40,231 | n/a | $21,751 | local 96% / federal 3% | General current expense 96% |
| 2023-24 | $42,766,617 | 215 | $198,914 | $34,580 | n/a | $22,002 | local 100% | General current expense 94% |
| 2024-25 | $41,542,059 | 79 | $525,849 | $50,067 | n/a | $22,204 | local 100% | General current expense 94% |
| 2025-26 | $44,500,000 | 100 | $445,000 | $46,676 | n/a | $22,541 | local 100% | General current expense 93% |
Money columns are converted to 2025 dollars using BLS CPI-U annual averages. Peer columns use the Passaic County average when at least six local peer districts have usable UFB rows for that year. On-roll is UFB planning enrollment, not fall enrollment; UFB year columns mix actual-cost, revised/original-budget, and proposed-budget bases.
Fund balance and reserve source history
Latest named source rows total $0, 0% of operating-budget scale. For scale, local, state, and federal operating-revenue summaries excluding the other/fund-balance bucket equal 100% of operating-budget scale. The named-source-row scale is -8 pts versus the Passaic County average.
Budgeted fund balance is a planned source row. It is not, by itself, proof of a structural deficit or a cash-balance claim.
This is a named UFB revenue-source row, not a recurring operating-revenue stream.
Maintenance reserve rows are restricted-source context and should be read with facilities and capital rows.
Rows are named UFB revenue-source rows for fund balance, reserve withdrawals, and carryover. They are contextual source rows, not audited cash, recurring revenue, an additive funding bridge, or proof of structural imbalance. Latest source and peer average are scaled to each district's proposed operating budget. Proposal movement uses the latest UFB current/revised and proposed columns. Real movement compares 2019-20 with 2025-26 in 2025 dollars, with operating-equivalent shares using each year's proposed operating budget. Peer avg is the Passaic County average where at least six local peer districts have usable revenue rows.
Named-line history evidence
Rows are selected from the strongest contextual named-line movers in this district report. Amounts are converted to 2025 dollars; the smaller note in each year is the row as a share of that year's proposed operating budget. A $0 cell means the source row had no positive proposed amount in that loaded UFB year. Rows are source-file evidence and can be nested, so they should not be added together.
Operating revenue mix over time
Each stacked bar shows operating revenue sources as a share of that UFB year’s proposed operating budget. The categories are operating-fund sources, not all-funds revenue. UFB year columns mix actual-cost, revised/original-budget, and proposed-budget bases, so use the bars as a structural trend, not an audited year-over-year bridge.
Operating use mix over time
Each stacked bar shows high-level General Fund appropriation rows as shares of that UFB year’s proposed operating budget. The chart uses only rows that can be treated as high-level operating uses; detailed rows below are nested and non-additive. UFB year columns mix actual-cost, revised/original-budget, and proposed-budget bases, so use the bars as a structural trend, not an audited year-over-year bridge.
Budget report section
Which spending categories, budget families, and source rows are large or unusual?
Budget family context matrix
Largest current family signal: Transportation, $49,415,033 or 111% of operating-budget scale. Largest real movement: Other named rows, +$9,105,146 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. Widest peer gap: Transportation, 101 pts above the Passaic County average.
| Family and source row | Latest scale | Peer gap | Real movement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transportation2 latest rowsLargest latest rowTransportation Fees from Other Local Education AuthoritiesRevenue line 250 · $26,292,893 | 111%$49,415,033 | +101 ptspeer avg 10% | +$5,440,987-10 pts op. shift |
| General current expense1 latest rowsLargest latest rowTotal General Current ExpenseAppropriation line 72260 · $41,360,242 | 93%$41,360,242 | +3 ptspeer avg 90% | +$5,046,740-7 pts op. shift |
| Other named rows9 latest rowsLargest latest rowTotal Adult Education-LocalAppropriation line 80340 · $2,827,758 | 24%$10,614,828 | +21 ptspeer avg 3% | +$9,105,146+20 pts op. shift |
| Local taxes and local sources1 latest rowsLargest latest rowUnrestricted Miscellaneous RevenuesRevenue line 300 · $11,814,800 | 27%$11,814,800 | -35 ptspeer avg 61% | +$3,976,123+5 pts op. shift |
| Instruction programs5 latest rowsLargest latest rowTotal Instructional Alternative Ed ProgramAppropriation line 21620 · $1,812,183 | 5%$2,335,389 | -22 ptspeer avg 28% | -$800,101-3 pts op. shift |
| State aid0 latest rowsLargest latest rowNo positive latest-year row. | 0%$0 | -30 ptspeer avg 30% | $00 pts op. shift |
| Employee benefits1 latest rowsLargest latest rowTotal Personal Services-Employee BenefitsAppropriation line 71260 · $4,040,842 | 9%$4,040,842 | -7 ptspeer avg 16% | +$1,949,205+3 pts op. shift |
| Transfers and tuition1 latest rowsLargest latest rowTotal TuitionRevenue line 190 · $6,368,307 | 14%$6,368,307 | +2 ptspeer avg 13% | +$200,613-3 pts op. shift |
| Special education and student supports6 latest rowsLargest latest rowTotal Undistributed Expenditures-Speech, OT, PT and Related ServicesAppropriation line 40580 · $4,875,175 | 14%$6,243,537 | -2 ptspeer avg 16% | +$1,009,3030 pts op. shift |
| Administration and central services4 latest rowsLargest latest rowTotal Undistributed Expenditures-Administrative InformationtechnologyAppropriation line 47620 · $1,481,810 | 8%$3,510,905 | +2 ptspeer avg 6% | +$1,496,840+2 pts op. shift |
This matrix ranks the highest-signal UFB families for this district. Latest scale is 2025-26 source-row dollars divided by proposed operating budget; peer gap uses the same denominator against the Passaic County average; real movement compares 2019-20 with 2025-26 in 2025 dollars. Bars are scaled separately within each metric column. Families are contextual, nested source-row groups, not an additive accounting schedule.
Named family peer context
This names the local districts nearest this district on selected source-family shares, so category claims can be checked against specific peers rather than only the Passaic County average.
| Family and source row | This district | Named local checks | Local range |
|---|---|---|---|
| TransportationIs transportation a visible cost or aid signal relative to other districts?Transportation Fees from Other Local Education AuthoritiesRevenue line 250; $26,292,893 | 111%$49,415,033; rank 1 of 21+101 pts vs Passaic County average (10%) | Next higherNo local peer higherNext lowerBloomingdale Boro 9% | Northern Region Educational Services Commission 111% to North Haledon Boro 3%Transportation appears in both aid/revenue and appropriation rows; read the file label. |
| Local taxes and local sourcesHow much of the budget story is local levy, tuition, fees, or miscellaneous local revenue?Unrestricted Miscellaneous RevenuesRevenue line 300; $11,814,800 | 27%$11,814,800; rank 17 of 21-35 pts vs Passaic County average (61%) | Next higherHaledon Boro 28%Next lowerProspect Park Boro 22% | North Haledon Boro 101% to Passaic City 6%Mostly revenue-file rows. Tax levy is merged across label variants where the source changed names. |
| Other named rowsWhich remaining named rows deserve a closer district-level look?Total Adult Education-LocalAppropriation line 80340; $2,827,758 | 24%$10,614,828; rank 1 of 21+21 pts vs Passaic County average (3%) | Next higherNo local peer higherNext lowerProspect Park Boro 7% | Northern Region Educational Services Commission 24% to Little Falls Twp 0%A catch-all for contextual rows that do not fit the named families above. |
| State aidWhich aid lines explain dependence on state funding or first-to-latest movement?No positive latest-year source row. | 0%$0; rank 21 of 21-30 pts vs Passaic County average (30%) | Next higherTotowa Boro 5%Next lowerNo local peer lower | Passaic City 97% to Northern Region Educational Services Commission 0%Includes aid rows other than preschool-specific rows, which are separated because they often move as a program block. |
| Instruction programsWhich classroom or instructional program rows define the core spending structure?Total Instructional Alternative Ed ProgramAppropriation line 21620; $1,812,183 | 5%$2,335,389; rank 19 of 21-22 pts vs Passaic County average (28%) | Next higherPassaic Co Manchester Reg 23%Next lowerPaterson City 5% | Passaic County Vocational 45% to Passaic City 4%Instruction rows can be nested inside broader General Fund current-expense totals. |
Shares use 2025-26 source-family dollars divided by each district’s proposed operating budget. "Next higher" and "next lower" are numerically higher or lower on that same share, not better or worse. Families are contextual, nested UFB source-row groups, so read named peers as reporting checks rather than an additive accounting schedule.
Category history and peer scale
Student transportation sits 45 pts above the Passaic County average. General current expense changed +$5,046,740 in real dollars from 2019-20 to 2025-26.
| Budget category | Layer | Latest amount | Latest op. equiv. | Peer avg | Share change | Real $ change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General current expense | High-level operating use | $41,360,242 | 93% | 90% | -7 pts | +$5,046,740 |
| School-based budgeting | High-level operating use | $0 | 0% | 4% | 0 pts | $0 |
| Charter / Renaissance transfers | High-level operating use | $0 | 0% | 2% | 0 pts | $0 |
| Capital outlay | High-level operating use | $312,000 | <1% | 3% | +1 pt | +$312,000 |
| Special schools | High-level operating use | $2,827,758 | 6% | <1% | +6 pts | +$2,827,758 |
| Core instruction rows | Nested cost row | $758,233 | 2% | 32% | -4 pts | -$1,178,968 |
| Student supports and services | Nested cost row | $5,495,304 | 12% | 8% | 0 pts | +$854,548 |
| Instruction tuition | Nested cost row | $0 | 0% | 7% | 0 pts | $0 |
| Administration and central services | Nested cost row | $3,510,905 | 8% | 6% | +2 pts | +$1,496,840 |
| Operations and maintenance | Nested cost row | $311,875 | <1% | 8% | -1 pt | -$349,604 |
| Student transportation | Nested cost row | $23,122,140 | 52% | 7% | -8 pts | +$1,384,850 |
| Employee benefits | Nested cost row | $4,040,842 | 9% | 16% | +3 pts | +$1,949,205 |
| Special Revenue Funds | Outside-operating scale | $0 | 0% | 6% | 0 pts | $0 |
| Debt Service Funds | Outside-operating scale | $0 | 0% | 2% | 0 pts | $0 |
Rows mix high-level operating uses, nested lower-level cost rows, and outside-operating scale rows, so do not add them. Latest op. equiv., peer avg, and share change use proposed operating budget as the denominator. Real-dollar change is from 2019-20 to 2025-26 in 2025 dollars. Peer avg is the Passaic County average where at least six local peer districts have usable UFB rows.
Budget family lens
Largest family-level source-row signal: Transportation, $49,415,033 or 111% of operating-budget scale. Largest first-to-latest real movement: Other named rows, +$9,105,146 in 2025 dollars. Widest local peer gap: Transportation, 101 pts above the Passaic County average on the same operating-scale basis.
Transportation appears in both aid/revenue and appropriation rows; read the file label.
General current expense is a high-level operating row; lower-level rows inside it can overlap and should not be added back to it.
A catch-all for contextual rows that do not fit the named families above.
Mostly revenue-file rows. Tax levy is merged across label variants where the source changed names.
Instruction rows can be nested inside broader General Fund current-expense totals.
Includes aid rows other than preschool-specific rows, which are separated because they often move as a program block.
Benefit rows are named appropriation rows that can overlap with salary-bearing functions.
Transfer and tuition rows often identify the districts where money leaves the district-run setting.
Rows can mix instruction, support services, and placement-related services.
This is source-row context, not a full administrative payroll analysis.
Special-revenue totals are outside-operating scale signals and should not be added to General Fund operating rows.
Capital and debt rows use operating budget only as a common scale reference.
Operations rows are lower-level appropriation rows and should not be added to high-level totals.
Reserve and fund-balance rows are context signals, not recurring operating revenue.
Preschool rows can appear in revenue and appropriation files and can be outside ordinary K-12 comparisons.
Federal rows are source-file grant lines and can sit outside the operating-budget story.
School-based budgeting rows are allocation signals; they can overlap with lower-level program and staffing rows.
This groups contextual UFB revenue and appropriation rows into the same reader-facing families used by the statewide budget explorer. Latest scale uses 2025-26 proposed source-row dollars divided by proposed operating budget; real movement compares 2019-20 with 2025-26 in 2025 dollars. Peer avg is the Passaic County average where at least six local peer districts have usable UFB rows. Families are reporting lenses over nested source rows, not additive accounting schedules.
Budget lines that moved
| UFB row | Type | 2019-20 | 2025-26 | Real change | Op. share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total General Current Expense | Appropriation | $36,313,502 | $41,360,242 | +$5,046,740 | -7 pts |
| Total Revenues from Local Sources | Revenue | $36,313,502 | $44,500,000 | +$8,186,498 | 0 pts |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures | Appropriation | $32,931,705 | $36,620,566 | +$3,688,861 | -8 pts |
| Unrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues | Revenue | $7,838,677 | $11,814,800 | +$3,976,123 | +5 pts |
| Total Adult Education-Local | Appropriation | $0 | $2,827,758 | +$2,827,758 | +6 pts |
| Total Special Schools | Appropriation | $0 | $2,827,758 | +$2,827,758 | +6 pts |
| Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities | Revenue | $22,236,757 | $26,292,893 | +$4,056,136 | -2 pts |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures-Student Transportation Services | Appropriation | $21,737,290 | $23,122,140 | +$1,384,850 | -8 pts |
| Total Adult Education-Local-Support Services | Appropriation | $0 | $2,444,052 | +$2,444,052 | +5 pts |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures-Speech, OT, PT and Related Services | Appropriation | $2,394,198 | $4,875,175 | +$2,480,977 | +4 pts |
Ranked contextual UFB revenue and appropriation rows by movement from 2019-20 to 2025-26. Amounts are inflation-adjusted to 2025 dollars using BLS CPI-U annual averages. Rows are selected and often nested, so they do not add to a complete budget; the UFB year columns also mix actual-cost, revised/original-budget, and proposed-budget bases.
Budget report section
Which denominator, service-load, need, labor, and pupil-cost rows change the per-student read?
Cost basis reconciliation
operating budget per UFB on-roll is $445,000, $398,324 above the Passaic County average. The other per-student rows below show where a different numerator or student denominator changes the read.
| Per-student basis | This district | Local peer read | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| NJDOE comparative cost per pupil | not published | No latest-year published comparative-cost value to rank. | Published NJDOE comparative-cost line. The report does not recompute it from operating dollars or enrollment. |
| Operating budget per UFB on-roll | $445,000 | $398,324 above the Passaic County average; Passaic County average: $46,676; rank 1 of 21. | Proposed General Fund operating budget divided by UFB planning on-roll. This is a scale check, not the NJDOE comparative-cost line. |
| Operating budget per fall-enrolled student | $754,237 | $724,140 above the Passaic County average; Passaic County average: $30,097; rank 1 of 21. | Proposed operating budget divided by NJDOE fall enrollment on the district profile. The local average is aggregate-weighted so tiny fall denominators do not dominate; this does not replace NJDOE’s cost metric. |
Use this panel before comparing per-pupil figures: the same district can look high, low, or ordinary depending on whether the report is using NJDOE comparative cost, operating budget, fall enrollment, all-funds totals, or tax levy.
Student flow and money path
The budget route map puts the cost question into reader terms: received-from-other-district rows equal 100% of UFB on-roll. Dollar rows use operating-budget shares; student-flow rows use UFB planning-enrollment shares, so the table keeps the evidence separate instead of adding it together.
| Path | Latest scale | Local peer read | Read as |
|---|---|---|---|
| General current expense | $41.4 million (93% of operating) | 3 pts above the Passaic County average; Passaic County average: 90%; rank 14 of 21. | The broad district-run operating base. Lower-level instructional, support, benefits, operations, and administrative rows can sit inside or beside this accounting path. |
| School-based budgeting | no positive latest row | 4 pts below the Passaic County average; Passaic County average: 4%; rank 3 of 21. | A published school-resource allocation path, where present. It is not an added cost on top of the same operating budget without reading the source rows. |
| Charter / Renaissance transfers | no positive latest row | 2 pts below the Passaic County average; Passaic County average: 2%; rank 15 of 21. | Operating dollars routed to charter or Renaissance rows. Read beside resident enrollment, district-run enrollment, and charter/Renaissance context before making a classroom-spending claim. |
| Received from other districts | 100 (100% of UFB on-roll) | 94 pts above the Passaic County average; Passaic County average: 6%; rank 1 of 21. | A receiving-service path that can change the fair denominator. Read with tuition or receiving-revenue rows before treating resident-based cost comparisons as complete. |
This panel is a reporting map for Passaic County districts comparisons: dollar paths use proposed General Fund operating-budget scale, while service paths use UFB planning-enrollment rows. It does not claim that these rows add to one total.
Fall enrollment and student need
This section keeps the student denominator beside the budget rows: UFB planning enrollment, fall enrollment, per-student scale checks, and latest fall-enrollment need rows for the same local peer frame.
| Measure | This district | Local context | Read as |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fall enrollment | 59 | <1% of peer fall enrollment | NJDOE fall enrollment count used on the district profile. |
| UFB planning on-roll | 100 | 169% of fall enrollment | +41 versus fall |
| Operating budget per UFB on-roll | $445,000 | $46,676 | $398,324 above the Passaic County average |
| Operating budget per fall-enrolled student | $754,237 | $30,097 | $724,140 above the Passaic County average |
| Fall row | Count | Share | Local avg / rank | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free/reduced-price lunch | 59 | 100% | 58% · rank 1 of 23 | +42 pts |
| Multilingual learners | 10 | 17% | 21% · rank 3 of 21 | -4 pts |
| Students experiencing homelessness | 0 | 0% | <1% · rank 18 of 21 | -1 pt |
Fall rows come from NJDOE Fall Enrollment; UFB on-roll rows come from the NJDOE User-Friendly Budget enrollment file. Operating budget per fall-enrolled student is a scale check for interpretation, not a replacement for NJDOE's published comparative-cost measure.
Service-load and denominator history
Latest UFB planning on-roll is 100. From 2019-20 to 2025-26, that denominator changed -7 (-6.5%). Latest planning-load shares: received-from-other-district rows 100% of UFB on-roll. Largest latest service-load category: Received from other districts, 100% of on-roll. Largest count movement: Net interdistrict flow, -7.
Received-from-other-district minus sent-to-other-district rows; private and preschool placements are separate.
Receiving rows can make resident-based cost comparisons misleading without tuition and service context.
This is a planning-enrollment row, not a fall enrollment special-education count.
Combines private school, contract preschool, sent-to-other-district, and state-facility planning rows.
Combines regular and special-education sent-to-other-district UFB planning rows.
Read with tuition, special-services, and transportation rows before calling this ordinary operating growth.
Rows use the UFB budget-enrollment planning file across loaded years, not NJDOE fall enrollment. Latest load and peer average are scaled to each district's UFB planning on-roll. Count movement compares 2019-20 with 2025-26. Peer avg is the Passaic County average where at least six local peer districts have usable planning rows. These rows explain the cost denominator and service-load context; they do not replace NJDOE's published comparative-cost measure.
Labor, benefits, and listed salaries
This section pulls together salary-bearing pupil-cost rows, the employee-benefits appropriation row, and the selected administrative salary side file so labor-cost signals can be read before the raw source tables.
| Measure | This district | Local context | Read as |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employee benefits appropriation row | $4.0 million · 9% | 16% peer avg; 7 pts below the Passaic County average | Named UFB appropriation row, scaled to the operating budget. |
| Listed administrative base salaries | $1.5 million · $15,018 per UFB on-roll | $1,490 peer avg; rank 1 of 21 | 13 selected UFB salary rows. |
| Highest listed administrative base salary | $185,400 | $218,201 peer avg; rank 19 of 21 | Superintendent |
Salary and benefits rows can overlap with broader NJDOE pupil-cost totals and nested UFB appropriation rows. Administrative salary rows are selected UFB-listed roles with district-reported FTE/shared-service fields; they are not full payroll and should not be added to pupil-cost salary rows. Peer averages use Passaic County districts with usable latest-year UFB rows.
Budget enrollment and placements
| UFB enrollment row | Count | Share of on-roll |
|---|---|---|
| On-roll, full | 100 | 100% |
| Received from other districts | 100 | 100% |
These are UFB budget-enrollment planning rows, not the fall enrollment counts used elsewhere on the profile.
Budget report section
Which tax basis, tax effort, averages, ranks, and gaps shape the comparison?
Tax effort and tax base
Mixed tax context.
| Measure | This district | Passaic County average | Gap | Local rank | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Municipal rate spread | 0 | 0.033 | -0.033 | 4 of 21 | Highest minus lowest plausible estimated rate across municipal/regional slices. |
Tax levy per UFB on-roll comes from the UFB summary tax levy and planning enrollment. Estimated tax rates and equalized values come from the UFB esttax side file, use plausible rate rows only, and are shown per $100 of valuation. This is tax-base context for budget reporting, not tax-bill advice or audited property-tax data.
Budget measures that stand out locally
| Measure | This district | Peer avg | Gap | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Listed admin base salaries per UFB on-roll student | $15,018 | $1,490 | +$13,528 | 1 of 21 |
| Operating budget per UFB on-roll student | $445,000 | $46,676 | +$398,324 | 1 of 21 |
| Student transportation share | 52% | 7% | +45 pts | 1 of 21 |
| Local operating revenue share | 100% | 66% | +34 pts | 1 of 21 |
| Highest listed admin base salary | $185,400 | $218,201 | -$32,801 | 19 of 21 |
| Operations and maintenance share | <1% | 8% | -8 pts | 21 of 21 |
| Fund balance / other operating revenue share | 0% | 7% | -7 pts | 20 of 21 |
| Employee benefits share | 9% | 16% | -7 pts | 19 of 21 |
Peer averages and ranks compare against Passaic County districts with usable values for the same 2025-26 UFB measure. Rank is ordered from highest value to lowest value; higher is not automatically better or worse.
UFB lines unlike local peers
Largest line-item differences: Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities is 59%, +56 pts versus the peer average; Total Tax Levy is 0%, -58 pts versus the peer average.
| UFB row | File | Amount | Op. equiv. | Peer avg | Gap | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Tax Levy | Revenue | $0 | 0% | 58% | -58 pts | 21 of 21 |
| Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities | Revenue | $26,292,893 | 59% | 3% | +56 pts | 1 of 21 |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures-Student Transportation Services | Appropriation | $23,122,140 | 52% | 7% | +45 pts | 1 of 21 |
| Total Revenues from Local Sources | Revenue | $44,500,000 | 100% | 66% | +34 pts | 1 of 21 |
| Total Revenues from State Sources | Revenue | $0 | 0% | 27% | -27 pts | 21 of 21 |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures | Appropriation | $36,620,566 | 82% | 56% | +26 pts | 1 of 21 |
| Unrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues | Revenue | $11,814,800 | 27% | 2% | +25 pts | 1 of 21 |
| Total Regular Programs-Instruction | Appropriation | $10,000 | <1% | 22% | -22 pts | 21 of 21 |
| Equalization Aid | Revenue | $0 | 0% | 19% | -19 pts | 10 of 21 |
| Total Tuition | Revenue | $6,368,307 | 14% | 1% | +13 pts | 1 of 21 |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures-Speech, OT, PT and Related Services | Appropriation | $4,875,175 | 11% | 2% | +9 pts | 1 of 21 |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures-Operation and Maintenance of Plant Services | Appropriation | $311,875 | <1% | 8% | -8 pts | 21 of 21 |
This scans contextual revenue and appropriation rows against Passaic County districts with usable 2025-26 UFB data. The operating-equivalent columns use each district’s proposed operating budget as a scale reference; peer-common rows missing from this district are treated as $0 so absences can surface. Rows remain nested and non-additive.
Budget comparison matrix
| Measure | This district | Passaic County average | Local rank | NJ avg | NJ rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating budget per UFB on-roll student | $445,000 | $46,676 | 1 of 21 | $39,253 | 3 of 578 |
| Local operating revenue share | 100% | 66% | 1 of 21 | 69% | 1 of 595 |
| Federal operating revenue share | 0% | <1% | 20 of 20 | <1% | 350 of 386 |
| Fund balance / other operating revenue share | 0% | 7% | 20 of 21 | 7% | 572 of 595 |
| Employee benefits share | 9% | 16% | 19 of 21 | 17% | 544 of 586 |
| Operations and maintenance share | <1% | 8% | 21 of 21 | 9% | 579 of 587 |
| Student transportation share | 52% | 7% | 1 of 21 | 6% | 7 of 592 |
| Special Revenue Funds equivalent | 0% | 6% | 21 of 21 | 7% | 579 of 585 |
| Listed admin base salaries per UFB on-roll student | $15,018 | $1,490 | 1 of 21 | $1,366 | 5 of 575 |
| Highest listed admin base salary | $185,400 | $218,201 | 19 of 21 | $199,341 | 365 of 580 |
Averages and ranks use districts with usable values for the same latest UFB year. Ranks run from highest value to lowest value, so rank 1 is not automatically better or worse.
Budget report section
How do operating sources, operating uses, all-funds totals, grants, and debt fit together?
Budget anatomy
| Row | Amount | Op. share |
|---|---|---|
| Local sources | $44.5 million | 100% |
| Row | Amount | Op. share |
|---|---|---|
| General current expense | $41.4 million | 93% |
| Special schools | $2.8 million | 6% |
| Capital outlay | $312,000 | <1% |
No outside-operating rows reported in the latest UFB file.
This anatomy starts with the proposed operating budget as the common denominator. The outside-operating column uses the same denominator only as a scale reference; those rows can include grants, debt service, capital, and nested fund sections. The dynamic tables below scan 8 positive revenue rows and 32 positive appropriation rows; 9 changed revenue rows and 33 changed appropriation rows from the latest UFB files.
Budget report section
Which tax, balance, reserve, unusual-item, shared-service, school-resource, or salary rows matter?
Side-file history
| UFB year | Tax file | Balances / reserves | Notes / shared services | Resource / salary files |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | n/a | Unrestricted--General Operating Budget $3.7 million | 7 shared-service rows | 9 admin salary rows · $815,862 |
| 2020-21 | n/a | Unrestricted--General Operating Budget $3.6 million | 6 unusual rows · $8.4 million; 7 shared-service rows | 9 admin salary rows · $800,744 |
| 2021-22 | n/a | Unrestricted--General Operating Budget $3.6 million; reserve/fund-balance sources $395,515 | 6 unusual rows · $7.9 million; 6 shared-service rows | 9 admin salary rows · $855,308 |
| 2022-23 | n/a | Unrestricted-General Operating Budget $2.7 million; reserve/fund-balance sources $442,343 | 6 shared-service rows | 10 admin salary rows · $1.1 million |
| 2023-24 | n/a | Unrestricted-General Operating Budget $3.0 million | none reported | 12 admin salary rows · $1.3 million |
| 2024-25 | n/a | Unrestricted-General Operating Budget $3.6 million | none reported | 13 admin salary rows · $1.5 million |
| 2025-26 | n/a | Unrestricted-General Operating Budget $1.7 million | 27 unusual rows · $22.3 million | 13 admin salary rows · $1.5 million |
This table summarizes UFB side files across loaded years so latest-year tax, balance, unusual-item, shared-service, school-resource, and salary rows can be read in context. Recap rows, shared-service savings, and salary files are district-reported context rows, not audited operating totals.
Balance and reserve history
Latest projected close-year balances total $1,755,091, 4% of operating-budget scale. After inflation, total projected balance changed -$2,904,082 from 2019-20 to 2025-26. Restricted or named-reserve rows account for 2% of the latest projected balance. Largest latest category: Unrestricted operating balance, $1,717,038. Largest real movement: Unrestricted operating balance, -$2,942,135.
Estimated close-year balance from the UFB recap file; not an operating appropriation.
Capital reserve balances can make a district look cash-rich without changing current operating service levels.
Maintenance reserve is a balance row; compare with facilities and capital lines before treating it as spending.
A restricted balance row, not a recurring operating cost line.
Recap rows are UFB projected balances at the close of the budget year, not operating appropriations or a spendable-cash claim. Tiny placeholder rows below $1,000 are suppressed. Money movement compares 2019-20 with 2025-26 in 2025 dollars, and operating-equivalent shares use each year's proposed operating budget. Peer avg is the Passaic County average where at least six local peer districts have usable recap rows.
Taxes, reserves, and balances
| Recap category | Projected | Vs prior audited |
|---|---|---|
| Unrestricted-General Operating Budget | $1.7 million | $0 |
| Restricted-General Operating Budget: Unemployment Fund | $38,053 | $0 |
Tax rates are NJDOE estimated school-tax-rate rows per $100 of valuation. Balance rows come from the UFB recapitulation file; the projected column is the estimated balance at the close of the budget year, not a spendable operating line.
Unusual items and shared-service profile
The latest unusual-item file lists 27 positive rows totaling $22.3 million, 50% of operating-budget scale, +35 pts versus the Passaic County average. Largest unusual category: other unusual explanations, $12.2 million.
| Category | Latest amount | Largest source row |
|---|---|---|
| Other unusual explanationsWhich remaining one-off explanations need district-report follow-up? | $12.2 million27% op. equiv.; 8 rows | Various NJ school districts$5,765,000; speech/ot/pt services provided |
| Tuition and placementsAre tuition, private placements, special education, or out-of-district services the unusual item? | $4.8 million11% op. equiv.; 5 rows | Hope Academy Passaic City Schools$2,050,000; increase in tuition |
| Transportation and operationsDo transportation, utilities, facilities operations, or maintenance explain the unusual row? | $4.4 million10% op. equiv.; 13 rows | Various NJ School Districts$2,629,893; increase in transportation costs and purchase of additional transportation vehicles |
| State aid, loans, and timingAre unusual rows really about aid timing, advances, loans, or state-support mechanics? | $845,0002% op. equiv.; 1 rows | NYC DOE$845,000; phoenix center |
This panel classifies the latest UFB unusual-item and shared-service side files using the same reporting categories as the statewide budget explorer. Positive unusual-item dollars can duplicate named revenue or appropriation rows elsewhere in the budget. Shared-service savings are optional district-entered context, not audited offsets to current spending. Peer comparisons use Passaic County districts where enough peers have usable side-file rows.
Budget notes and shared services
| Source / reason | Amount | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Various NJ school districts | $5,765,000 | speech/ot/pt services provided |
| Medicaid | $3,230,000 | post 21 program estimated at full capacity |
| Various NJ School Districts | $2,629,893 | increase in transportation costs and purchase of additional transportation vehicles |
| Hope Academy Passaic City Schools | $2,050,000 | increase in tuition |
| Various NJ school districts | $1,900,000 | technology services provided |
| Tuition from parents | $1,457,370 | full capacity at ramapo daycare and new before/after care program at woodland park |
Showing 6 of 27 unusual rows.
Unusual items and shared services are district-reported UFB explanation rows. Shared-service savings are optional, so a listed arrangement can show no dollar amount.
Listed administrative salary history
The UFB employees side file lists selected administrative salary rows for 7 loaded budget years. Listed base salary moved from $1.0 million in 2019-20 to $1.5 million in 2025-26 in 2025 dollars (up $474,415). The selected-row count changed from 9 to 13 (+4).
| UFB year | Listed base | Rows / FTE | Highest listed role | Add-ons / terms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | $1.0 million | 9 rows; FTE 9no shared rows | $161,187NICHOLAS VANCHERI · Coordinator/Director/Manager/Supervisor: EDUCATION | $76,383 add-on dollar fields36 text-term field entries |
| 2020-21 | $996,070 | 9 rows; FTE 9no shared rows | $164,000NICHOLAS VANCHERI · Coordinator/Director/Manager/Supervisor: EDUCATION | $74,152 add-on dollar fields36 text-term field entries |
| 2021-22 | $1.0 million | 9 rows; FTE 9no shared rows | $168,468Nicholas Vancheri · Superintendent: INTERIM | $80,752 add-on dollar fields38 text-term field entries |
| 2022-23 | $1.2 million | 10 rows; FTE 10no shared rows | $176,012Nicholas Vancheri · Superintendent | $74,442 add-on dollar fields40 text-term field entries |
| 2023-24 | $1.4 million | 12 rows; FTE 12no shared rows | $174,125Nicholas Vancheri · Superintendent | $148,827 add-on dollar fields50 text-term field entries |
| 2024-25 | $1.5 million | 13 rows; FTE 13no shared rows | $184,736Dr. Nicholas V. Vancheri · Superintendent | $312,516 add-on dollar fields52 text-term field entries |
| 2025-26 | $1.5 million | 13 rows; FTE 13no shared rows | $185,400Dr. Nicholas V. Vancheri · Superintendent | $437,450 add-on dollar fields52 text-term field entries |
| Measure | This district | Passaic County average | Gap | Read as |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Listed base per UFB on-roll | $15,018 | $1,490 | +$13,528 | Selected admin base salaries divided by UFB planning on-roll.Local rank 1 of 21 among Passaic County districts with usable salary rows. |
| Listed rows per 1,000 UFB on-roll | 130 | 12.1 | +117.9 | Selected listed administrative rows scaled to enrollment.Local rank 1 of 21 among Passaic County districts with usable salary rows. |
| Listed FTE per 1,000 UFB on-roll | 130 | 12.1 | +117.9 | FTE field total scaled to enrollment; not district staffing headcount.Local rank 1 of 21 among Passaic County districts with usable salary rows. |
| Shared-service row share | 0% | 3% | -3 pts | Share of selected salary rows marked shared in the side file.Local rank 2 of 21 among Passaic County districts with usable salary rows. |
Dollar columns in the history table are converted to 2025 dollars with CPI-U. The UFB employees side file lists selected administrative salary rows, FTE/shared flags, add-on compensation fields, work/leave terms, and comments; it is not full payroll, a staffing census, total compensation, or an operating-budget category. Peer checks use the latest matched year only and rank higher numeric values first.
Listed administrative salaries
The UFB salary side file lists 13 selected administrative rows totaling $1.5 million in base salaries. It also includes district-reported add-on compensation fields, work and leave-day terms, and payout or buyback text where those fields are filled.
| Field | Reported total | Count | Largest listed row | Read as |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base salary | $1.5 million | 13 | $185,400 · Dr. Nicholas V. Vancheri · Superintendent | Selected listed administrative base salaries. |
| Post-employment benefits | $265,677 | 13 | $34,253 · Dr. Nicholas V. Vancheri · Superintendent | District-reported post-employment benefit field. |
| Insurance | $145,673 | 10 | $38,573 · Oneida Phillip · Coordinator/Director/Manager/Supervisor: Dir of Transportation | District-reported insurance field. |
| Allowances | $23,900 | 10 | $7,000 · Dr. Nicholas V. Vancheri · Superintendent | District-reported allowance field. |
| Stipends | $1,500 | 1 | $1,500 · Dr. Bradford Haimowitz · Coordinator/Director/Manager/Supervisor: Director of S... | District-reported stipend field. |
| Bonuses | $700 | 1 | $700 · Matthew Cielo · Information Technology: On-Site Technician | District-reported bonus field. |
| Field | Median | Range | Rows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Work days | 240 | 180 to 260 | 13 |
| Vacation days | 20 | 0 to 22 | 13 |
| Sick days | 12 | 10 to 12 | 13 |
| Personal days | 4 | 3 to 4 | 13 |
| Non-work days | 1 | 1 to 1 | 13 |
| Field group | Count | Distinct terms | Common text examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-work-day note | 13 | 1 | Family Illness Day (13 rows) |
| Personal-day payout | 13 | 2 | N/A (12 rows); Prohibited |
| Sick-day payout | 13 | 1 | Only upon retirement (13 rows) |
| Vacation-day payout | 13 | 4 | Accumulated Vacation Days Payout (8 rows); Accumulated Vacations Days Payout (2 rows); N/A (2 rows) |
| Listed employee | Role | Base salary | FTE/shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Nicholas V. Vancheri | Superintendent | $185,400 | 1 |
| Ann Kluck | Business Administrator | $143,639 | 1 |
| Ayanna Thorne | Coordinator/Director/Manager/Supervisor: Dir of Alt Education | $125,375 | 1 |
| Brian Zinn | Coordinator/Director/Manager/Supervisor: Dir of Technology | $125,375 | 1 |
| Dr. Bradford Haimowitz | Coordinator/Director/Manager/Supervisor: Director of Special Svcs | $125,375 | 1 |
| Oneida Phillip | Coordinator/Director/Manager/Supervisor: Dir of Transportation | $125,375 | 1 |
| Dean Atkinson | Information Technology: Field Network Admin | $107,561 | 1 |
| Julie Vysotsky | Coordinator/Director/Manager/Supervisor | $101,626 | 1 |
Administrative salary rows are selected listed roles from the UFB employees side file, not complete payroll, a contract audit, or an operating-budget total. Component fields are shown separately because allowances, benefits, remuneration, leave days, payouts, and comments are mixed units and can overlap in meaning. Dollar fields are nominal latest-file values. Showing the top 8 of 13 listed rows.
Budget report section
Which visible UFB revenue and appropriation rows support the report?
UFB source-file ledger
These are the exact NJDOE User-Friendly Budget CSV files behind this report. Links open the statewide source files for 2025-26, while the row counts show how much of each file matched this district in the local warehouse.
| File | Latest source file | Rows from this district | Use and limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue file2019-20 to 2025-26 (7 files) | rev26.csv2025-26 NJDOE UFB statewide CSV | 8 positive rows | Named levy, aid, grant, tuition, fund-balance, reserve, and other source rows behind the operating-revenue mix.Includes subtotals and non-operating context rows; it is not one additive revenue schedule. |
| Appropriation file2019-20 to 2025-26 (7 files) | approp26.csv2025-26 NJDOE UFB statewide CSV | 32 positive rows | High-level operating uses, transfers, fund totals, lower-level program rows, capital, debt, and special-revenue scale.Many rows are nested; operating-equivalent shares are scale references, not additive totals. |
| Budget-enrollment file2019-20 to 2025-26 (7 files) | enroll26.csv2025-26 NJDOE UFB statewide CSV | 2 planning rows | UFB on-roll, special-education on-roll, sent/received placements, contract preschool, and denominator context.Planning enrollment is not the same as fall enrollment and should not be added to dollar rows. |
| Recap / balance file2019-20 to 2025-26 (7 files) | recap26.csv2025-26 NJDOE UFB statewide CSV | 14 balance rows | Projected close-year balances, reserves, restricted balances, and fund-balance context.Balance rows are not current operating appropriations or spendable-cash claims. |
| Unusual-item file2020-21 to 2025-26 (3 files) | unusual26.csv2025-26 NJDOE UFB statewide CSV | 27 rows | District-reported unusual revenue or appropriation explanations that may change the current-year story.Rows can duplicate named revenue or appropriation rows and should not be stacked as separate spending. |
| Admin-salary file2019-20 to 2025-26 (7 files) | employees26.csv2025-26 NJDOE UFB statewide CSV | 13 listed salary rows | Selected administrative salary rows, FTE, shared-service flags, contract fields, and comments where published.Selected listed administration is not complete payroll or total compensation. |
The links are source-file provenance, not district-specific extracts. Each CSV covers all districts published in that UFB file; the generated report filters those rows to this district and keeps source-family caveats attached before making comparisons.
Largest current UFB lines
| UFB row | File | Amount | Operating equiv. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Revenues from Local Sources | Revenue | $44,500,000 | 100% |
| Total General Current Expense | Appropriation | $41,360,242 | 93% |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures | Appropriation | $36,620,566 | 82% |
| Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities | Revenue | $26,292,893 | 59% |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures-Student Transportation Services | Appropriation | $23,122,140 | 52% |
| Unrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues | Revenue | $11,814,800 | 27% |
| Total Tuition | Revenue | $6,368,307 | 14% |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures-Speech, OT, PT and Related Services | Appropriation | $4,875,175 | 11% |
| Total Personal Services-Employee Benefits | Appropriation | $4,040,842 | 9% |
| Total Adult Education-Local | Appropriation | $2,827,758 | 6% |
| Total Special Schools | Appropriation | $2,827,758 | 6% |
| Total Adult Education-Local-Support Services | Appropriation | $2,444,052 | 5% |
| Total Instructional Alternative Ed Program | Appropriation | $1,812,183 | 4% |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures-Administrative Informationtechnology | Appropriation | $1,481,810 | 3% |
| Total Community Services Programs/Operations | Appropriation | $1,150,760 | 3% |
| Total Undistributed Expenditures-Support Services-General Administration | Appropriation | $937,577 | 2% |
Selected dynamically from every positive revenue and appropriation row in the latest UFB files after dropping outer totals. Rows come from different files and fund sections, so the operating-equivalent column is only a scale reference.
Main funds and transfers
| UFB appropriation row | Amount | Operating equiv. |
|---|---|---|
| Total expenditures net of transfers | $44,500,000 | 100% |
| General Fund grand total | $44,500,000 | 100% |
| General current expense | $41,360,242 | 93% |
| Capital outlay | $312,000 | <1% |
| Special schools | $2,827,758 | 6% |
Rows mix all-funds totals, General Fund rows, transfers, capital, special-revenue, and debt-service lines. The operating-equivalent column is a scale reference, not a claim that these rows add to the operating budget.
Selected operating cost lines
| UFB line | Amount | Op. share | Peer avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student transportation | $23,122,140 | 52% | 7% |
| Speech, OT, PT and related services | $4,875,175 | 11% | 2% |
| Employee benefits | $4,040,842 | 9% | 16% |
| Administrative information technology | $1,481,810 | 3% | <1% |
| General administration | $937,577 | 2% | 2% |
| Central services | $751,018 | 2% | 1% |
| Special education instruction | $748,233 | 2% | 8% |
| School administration | $340,500 | <1% | 2% |
| Operations and maintenance | $311,875 | <1% | 8% |
| Health services | $311,124 | <1% | <1% |
Not additive: these lower-level appropriation rows add texture, but they are nested inside broader fund categories and should not be added together as a complete budget mix.
Selected revenue lines
| UFB revenue row | Amount | Op. share | Peer avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unrestricted miscellaneous revenue | $11,814,800 | 27% | 2% |
| Tuition revenue | $6,368,307 | 14% | 1% |
These are selected source rows from operating, special-revenue, debt-service, and reserve sections. They are not additive because several are subtotals or belong to different funds.
Current UFB line appendix
| Line | Account | UFB row | Amount | Op. equiv. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 190 | 10-1300 | Total Tuition | $6,368,307 | 14% |
| 250 | 10-1420-1440 | Transportation Fees from Other Local Education Authorities | $26,292,893 | 59% |
| 260 | 10-1910 | Rents and Royalties | $24,000 | <1% |
| 300 | 10-1XXX | Unrestricted Miscellaneous Revenues | $11,814,800 | 27% |
| 370 | n/a | Total Revenues from Local Sources | $44,500,000 | 100% |
| Line | Account | UFB row | Amount | Op. equiv. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3200 | 11-1XX-100-XX | Total Regular Programs-Instruction | $10,000 | <1% |
| 10300 | 11-2XX-100-XX | Total Special Education-Instruction | $748,233 | 2% |
| 19620 | 11-421-XXX-XX | Total Before/After School Programs | $800,000 | 2% |
| 20620 | 11-422-XXX-XX | Total Summer School | $218,500 | <1% |
| 21620 | 11-423-XXX-XX | Total Instructional Alternative Ed Program | $1,812,183 | 4% |
| 27100 | 11-800-330-XX | Total Community Services Programs/Operations | $1,150,760 | 3% |
| 29680 | 11-000-211-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Attendance and Social Work | $10,000 | <1% |
| 30620 | 11-000-213-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Health Services | $311,124 | <1% |
| 40580 | 11-000-216-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Speech, OT, PT and Related Services | $4,875,175 | 11% |
| 41080 | 11-000-217-XX | Undistributed Expenditures–Other Support Services, Students–Extraordinary Services | $168,641 | <1% |
| 41660 | 11-000-218-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Guidance | $55,272 | <1% |
| 42200 | 11-000-219-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Child Study Teams | $85,092 | <1% |
| 43200 | 11-000-221-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Improvement of Instruction Services | $120,500 | <1% |
| 44180 | 11-000-223-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Instructional Staff Training Services | $9,000 | <1% |
| 45300 | 11-000-230-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Support Services-General Administration | $937,577 | 2% |
| 46160 | 11-000-240-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Support Services-School Administration | $340,500 | <1% |
| 47200 | 11-000-251-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Central Services | $751,018 | 2% |
| 47620 | 11-000-252-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Administrative Informationtechnology | $1,481,810 | 3% |
| 51120 | 11-000-26X-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Operation and Maintenance of Plant Services | $311,875 | <1% |
| 52480 | 11-000-270-XX | Total Undistributed Expenditures-Student Transportation Services | $23,122,140 | 52% |
| 71260 | 11-XXX-XXX-2X | Total Personal Services-Employee Benefits | $4,040,842 | 9% |
| 72140 | n/a | Total Undistributed Expenditures | $36,620,566 | 82% |
| 72260 | n/a | Total General Current Expense | $41,360,242 | 93% |
| 75880 | 12-XXX-XXX-73 | Total Equipment | $312,000 | <1% |
| 76400 | n/a | Total Capital Outlay | $312,000 | <1% |
| 80180 | 13-602-100-XX | Total Adult Education-Local-Instruction | $383,706 | <1% |
| 80320 | 13-602-200-XX | Total Adult Education-Local-Support Services | $2,444,052 | 5% |
| 80340 | 13-602-X00-XX | Total Adult Education-Local | $2,827,758 | 6% |
| 83080 | 13-XXX-XXX-XX | Total Special Schools | $2,827,758 | 6% |
This appendix lists all 34 contextual positive latest-year UFB revenue and appropriation rows after dropping outer totals, deduct rows, and known duplicate tax-levy label variants. Rows are still source-file rows, not one additive schedule; the operating-equivalent column uses the proposed operating budget only as a common scale reference.
The budget answer sheet turns the current proposal, peer and slice position, revenue model, use categories, student/service load, inflation-adjusted movement, and reserve/side-file context into direct reader questions in the first-read path. The budget front brief replaces the dense opening paragraph with a lead sentence, anchored takeaways, and a short synthesis paragraph so each load-bearing number has a comparison, time basis, fund scope, or denominator before the detailed report opens. The budget essentials panel answers the main resident questions before the long evidence stack: first read, peer cost, proposal movement, payer mix, category/source-family signal, inflation-adjusted trend, student denominator, and side-file context. The budget machine panel now appears immediately after the thesis and reporting notebook, preserving the same operating-squeeze route as the front brief when recurring pressure is the selected first read, then extracting the resident-facing mechanism across cost position, funding model, recurring cost engine, inflation and denominator movement, and proposal/reserve timing before the long evidence sections. The budget squeeze explainer now appears in the first-read path, connecting recurring operating sources, recurring cost families, CPI-adjusted per-student movement, service-load denominators, current proposal rows, one-time support, and local record checks before the long evidence sections. The budget evidence board now appears in the first-read path, putting peer and slice comparison frames, category-family movers, inflation/denominator checks, and nominal proposal rows side by side before the answer sheet and detailed proof sections. The budget operating model turns the first-read evidence into six compact resident reads: operating scale, payer mix, source-family uses, CPI-adjusted movement, latest proposal movement, and one-time, tax, or service-load checks that can change the interpretation. The comparison brief puts the published cost line into named local peer, statewide, funding-model, scale, cost-band, and high-signal category or service-load frames before the long report begins. The budget diagnosis ranks the strongest generated explanatory lanes before the long evidence sections, separating what each lane can explain from what it cannot prove. The peer position snapshot now follows the front brief so the opening cost, funding, and category or service-load comparisons are visible as local peer distributions before the report map, language key, and long evidence sections. The budget explanation brief now appears in the top report path after the answer sheet, separating largest current source-row family, widest local peer gap, largest inflation-adjusted family movement, and latest proposal-column movement before the map and detailed proof sections. The budget story package now appears in the top report path after the explanation brief, keeping the UFB-supported claim, fair comparison, inflation/category/proposal checks, next reporting move, and blocked overread on the same row before the peer snapshot and map. The budget mechanism read now appears in the top report path before the map, separating relative-cost, funding, category/slice, inflation/denominator, student/service-load, proposal-timing, one-time-support, and outside-operating explanations into proof, next-reporting, and blocked-overread columns. The budget thesis and reporting-order panel now appears directly after the front brief, turning the first-read evidence into an editor-style route: compare peers and slices first, then read categories/source rows, use CPI-adjusted movement and denominator checks as guardrails, and hand causal claims to outside reporting. The opening budget-story panel ranks the strongest generated reporting leads from latest-year peer comparisons, row-level scans, planning-enrollment rows, and inflation-adjusted movement. The budget story spine keeps each reportable signal beside its UFB proof, fair comparison, outside-reporting need, and overread caveat before the report opens the longer evidence sections. The budget storylines panel packages the strongest UFB signals as article routes with a working nut graf, reader value, proof basis, outside-reporting gap, and sentence to avoid before writing. The budget reading memo turns the strongest UFB signals into an opening editorial route: the lead angle to test, why the simple read is weak, which context changes the read, and what records or checks should come next. The question-to-reporting path turns the strongest district-specific UFB signals into resident questions, first comparison frames, records to pull, and unsupported shortcuts to block before writing. The public-hearing agenda converts the proposal, relative-cost, category, inflation, student/service, and side-file signals into concrete meeting questions, record requests, proof links, and unsupported readings to block. The budget news judgment filter labels ordinary nominal growth as background, separates UFB-ready facts from leads that need a second signal or outside records, and blocks causal or quality claims from UFB alone. The budget claim audit turns the strongest UFB-supported signals into sentence-level claims, then labels what still needs outside reporting and which unsupported shortcuts to block before writing. The comparison movement brief pulls selected peer-position trend measures into the opening story so readers can see whether the district moved toward or away from the local average on cost, funding, tax, category, and service-load signals. The operating story basis panel separates recurring General Fund operating evidence from live proposal movement, fund-balance/reserve sources, side-file context, and outside-operating rows before readers interpret the budget story. The structural squeeze test checks whether main operating-source movement, appropriation/use-family movement, limited support, service-load denominators, and peer position support a recurring-pressure hypothesis, while naming the outside records needed before writing a deficit, levy-cap, cut, or causal claim. The budget flow bridge keeps the relative cost frame, money in, money out, proposal movement, outside-operating rows, side files, and student denominator in one scan before readers enter the detailed evidence sections. The budget pressure map ranks the cost, funding, category, proposal, student/service-load, inflation, reserve/side-file, and outside-operating pressures a reader should test first, while separating what each pressure can explain from what it cannot prove. The budget tension checks pair current cost position, inflation-adjusted movement, proposal movement, tax burden, funding model, category slices, service load, reserves, and outside-operating rows so a reader can see which simple budget reads need a second signal. The category story map pulls current source-row scale, local peer gaps, inflation-adjusted movement, and latest proposal movement into one first-read map before the detailed category, trend, and proposal tables. The proposal-versus-trend bridge checks whether latest proposal-column movement continues, counters, or sits apart from loaded-year inflation-adjusted category movement. The budget reporting lead sheet turns the strongest generated signals into a ranked reporting agenda with evidence, reader questions, caveats, and links to the proof sections. The budget reporting notebook now appears directly after the thesis, translating the ranked UFB leads into outside records, interview checks, proof links, and unsupported readings to block before the longer report path opens. The editorial frame separates what UFB can establish from what still requires board documents, tax records, contracts, staffing context, or other outside reporting before causal claims are made. The budget model synthesis connects cost position, funding model, spending structure, service load, live proposal movement, inflation-adjusted trend, and side-file context into one reporting frame before the detailed evidence sections. The cost gap ledger translates the comparison into per-UFB-on-roll dollar gaps for operating scale, funding sources, use categories, pupil-cost rows, and service-load denominators before the detailed evidence sections. The cost-position clues panel now appears in the first-read path, naming the concrete UFB measures, funding and tax signals, named rows, proposal movement, denominator checks, and budget-year context that can explain or complicate the district’s comparative-cost position without claiming causality. The cost-position judgment panel now follows the clue scan in the first-read path, deciding whether the visible UFB signals line up with the published comparative-cost position, complicate it, or leave the explanation to outside reporting. The UFB source-coverage panel inventories the latest matched summary, revenue, appropriation, pupil-cost, planning-enrollment, tax, balance, unusual-item, shared-service, school-resource, and salary source families before the report routes them into evidence sections. The UFB source-file ledger links the exact latest NJDOE CSV files behind the district report and names the row count, use, and limit for each loaded budget file. The statewide budget-model panel names the broader comparison frames this district belongs to before the report moves into local peer evidence and source rows. The statewide slice-comparison panel opens with a relative-cost ladder across local peers, all NJ UFB districts, and matching latest-year groups for funding model, UFB on-roll scale, comparative-cost band, and generated category signals. The named similar-budget-model comps panel turns statewide slice logic into concrete district examples by naming districts with nearby latest-year UFB funding, scale, use, service-load, tax, and cost profiles. The change-driver panel summarizes first-to-latest UFB movement across real operating scale, planning-enrollment denominator shifts, peer-position changes, source shares, use shares, and named line rows. The per-student cost-change anatomy panel decomposes real operating budget per UFB on-roll into a budget-numerator effect and a planning-enrollment denominator effect, while keeping NJDOE comparative cost distinct. The operating funding-shift panel shows who paid differently across loaded UFB years by separating local, state, federal, and fund-balance/other operating-source shares, real-dollar movement, and latest local peer mix. The current-proposal panel compares the latest UFB revised/current-budget column with the proposed-budget column for operating revenue, high-level uses, NJDOE pupil-cost rows, and UFB planning enrollment. The proposal package panel groups material named revised/current-to-proposed UFB row movement into budget families, separating increases, reductions, net movement, largest rows, and local peer scale before the named-line driver table. The named-line proposal-driver panel scans every latest-year UFB revenue and appropriation row with revised/current and proposed amounts, then surfaces material nominal row changes with operating-budget-equivalent scale and same-row local peer context. The cost-basis reconciliation panel separates NJDOE comparative cost, operating-budget-per-student scale checks, all-funds context, and tax-levy pressure so per-student ranks are read with their numerator and denominator. The student-flow and money-path panel separates operating-dollar routes from UFB planning-enrollment routes so transfer rows, school-based budgeting, special-education load, sent placements, and received-student rows are read as distinct evidence. The local-standout table ranks funding, spending, placement, and pupil-cost measures against the same peer set; rank 1 means the highest value, not the best value. The local peer evidence strips show the strongest generated budget measures as peer distributions, so the rank and gap can be checked visually. The named peer context panel identifies the local districts immediately above and below this district on selected measures, plus the local range behind the average. The local comparison roster names every district in the local peer set behind the averages and ranks, with comparative cost, UFB planning enrollment, operating scale, and funding-model context. The current operating mix comparison uses paired stacked bars to compare this district with the local peer average for General Fund operating revenue sources and high-level operating uses, keeping the operating-budget denominator and non-additive category caveat visible. The position-over-time panel tracks selected budget measures against the local peer average across loaded UFB years, with money values converted to real dollars. The fall-enrollment and student-need panel puts UFB planning enrollment beside fall enrollment, per-student scale checks, free/reduced-price lunch, multilingual learners, and homelessness for the same local peer frame. The service-load history panel tracks UFB planning-enrollment rows across loaded years so denominator movement, special-education on-roll, sent placements, contract preschool, and receiving rows are visible before per-pupil cost comparisons. The labor-cost context panel puts salary-bearing pupil-cost rows, employee benefits, and selected administrative salary side-file rows in the local peer frame without treating those rows as complete payroll. The loaded-year ledger gives the annual operating-budget, UFB on-roll, real per-student cost, peer-average, funding-mix, and largest-use context behind the trend panels. The named-line history panel shows the selected UFB revenue and appropriation row movers year by year in real dollars and operating-budget-equivalent scale. The fund-balance and reserve source-history panel separates named balance, reserve, and carryover source rows from local, state, and federal operating-source summaries, then shows latest scale, local peer scale, proposal-column movement, and first-to-latest real movement. The category history table compares major operating uses, nested cost rows, and outside-operating scale rows by latest amount, peer share, first-to-latest share movement, and inflation-adjusted dollar movement. The budget-family context matrix gives a scan-first category view of which source-row families are largest now, furthest from local peers, or moving most after inflation before the detailed family cards and source rows. The named family peer context names the local districts immediately above and below this district on selected budget-family shares, plus the local range behind the peer average. The budget-family lens groups contextual UFB revenue and appropriation rows into reader-facing families with latest scale, local peer scale, first-to-latest real movement, and largest source-row evidence. The anatomy panel separates operating sources, high-level operating uses, and all-funds or outside-operating rows before the lower-level tables. The budget diagnostic turns the UFB source files into fixed reader questions about cost position, funding model, spending mix, student-service load, inflation-adjusted movement, and side-file context. The walkthrough gives the report a reader-facing path through money in, money out, costs and students, real-dollar changes, and UFB side files before the detailed tables. The comparison matrix extends the same measures to county and statewide averages and ranks where enough districts have usable values. The tax-effort panel separates UFB summary tax levy per planning student, estimated school-tax rates, equalized tax base, and municipal slice spread before the raw tax-rate side-file rows. The tax and balance panel uses NJDOE estimated tax-rate rows and recapitulation-of-balance rows, separating levy/rate context from operating spending. The side-file history table shows whether tax, balance, unusual-item, shared-service, school-resource, and salary context is persistent or latest-year-only. The balance and reserve history panel tracks projected close-year recap balances by category across loaded UFB years, with real-dollar movement, local peer scale, and restriction caveats. The administrative-salary table lists selected UFB administrative salary rows; it is not complete payroll. The listed administrative salary history panel tracks selected UFB employees side-file rows across loaded years in real dollars, then compares latest listed base, row, FTE, and shared-service scale with local peers. The budget-notes panel surfaces district-reported unusual revenue or appropriation explanations and shared-service entries. The unusual/shared-service profile classifies district-reported unusual-item explanations and shared-service arrangements before the raw side-file rows, while blocking additive or audited-savings readings. The spending-category bars use high-level General Fund appropriation rows as shares of the proposed operating budget; the neutral tick is the average among Passaic County districts with usable category data. The stacked trend bars show category shares of each loaded UFB year’s proposed operating budget, so they foreground structure rather than nominal dollar growth. The budget turning-points table compares adjacent loaded UFB years so annual real-dollar, peer-gap, payer-mix, source-family, named-row, and service-load movements surface before the longer trend evidence. The largest-lines table is selected from the positive line rows in the latest UFB revenue and appropriation files, excluding only outer totals. The current UFB line appendix lists every contextual positive latest-year revenue and appropriation row, keeping source-file line numbers and accounts visible. The peer-line table compares contextual UFB revenue and appropriation rows against the local peer set so unusually large, small, or absent named rows surface before the full line appendix. The main-funds table keeps all-funds, General Fund, transfer, special-revenue, capital, and debt-service rows visible without treating them as one additive mix. The selected cost table uses lower-level UFB appropriation rows for reader context; those rows are nested inside broader categories and are not additive. The trend-driver table compares contextual UFB rows from the first loaded budget year to the latest year in 2025 dollars; share changes use the operating budget as a scale reference. The selected revenue table pulls named aid, levy, reserve, and grant lines from the UFB revenue file; some rows are subtotals or come from non-operating funds. The enrollment/placement table uses UFB budget-enrollment planning rows, which can differ from fall enrollment. The stacked bar shows proposed General Fund operating revenue sources; grants, debt service, and transfers can make all-funds totals differ. Source: NJDOE User-Friendly Budgets, 2025-26; BLS CPI-U.
Budget report built from NJDOE User-Friendly Budget files loaded in the local warehouse, 2019-20 through 2025-26. Passaic County budget brief → · Compare all district budgets → · How this budget data works →
